Banner

By a Newsnet reporter
 
The 2012-13 shooting season will get underway in Scotland on Monday when guns, beaters, gamekeepers and their dogs will take to the moors in search of grouse.   Game laws and Godly adherence prohibit the shooting of grouse on the Sabbath, meaning no ‘Glorious 12th’ this year.

The start date may have slipped by 24 hours to the slightly less glorious sounding 13th, but for economic reasons, there will still be much to celebrate about the start of the new shooting season.

Independent research back in 2006 reported that Scotland’s economy benefits to the tune of £240m annually from game shooting.  This cash boost comes in the form of wages to gamekeepers and beaters, hotel accommodation for visiting guns and spend within the wider rural economy on everything from landrover repairs to wellies.

The Centre for Mountain Studies at Perth College UHI, has drilled further into the economic benefits brought by grouse shooting and moorland management in a research project at Tomintoul, Speyside. The Centre reported that 81% of the Tomintoul community felt that their area benefited from grouse shooting on the surrounding moorland, with 63% stating that working with grouse helped to keep young people in their sparsely populated area.

Economics aside, for some, the start of the shooting season is not such good news.  Animal rights organisations, such as the League Against Cruel Sports and Edinburgh based charity Onekind, actively call for grouse shooting to be banned.  The campaigners cite not only cruelty in the actual shooting of live game, but also in associated management practices such as snaring of grouse predators.

Snaring is a predator control tool seen as vital by many gamekeepers working on grouse moors.  There have been many long debates on the subject in the Scottish Parliament, the most recent of which, in 2011 resulted in new laws to ensure that only those trained to set snares can legally do so. 

The charge of cruelty in the actual shooting of the birds would appear to have been answered by the meat eating public.  Influenced by celebrity chefs and their use of game as a wild, healthy, natural and free-range alternative to intensive chicken, sales of game throughout Britain as a whole have increased 92% in the ten years since 2002.

Controversy around grouse shooting has also centred on the accusation, leveled by the Scottish Raptor Groups, RSPB and others, that it is grouse moor managers who are responsible for persecution of birds of prey such as the Golden Eagle and Hen Harrier.  Efforts by gamekeepers, land managers and their organisations to work together with the police to stamp out raptor persecution have helped to dispel such accusations and have also, in the past two years, led to a welcome drop in the numbers of birds of prey being poisoned and shot in Scotland.

Why then does a truly wild bird, such as Scotland’s iconic Red Grouse, require ‘management’, especially if the management and the managers can attract such controversy?

The answer lies in the need to achieve a ‘shootable surplus’, i.e. to ensure that the grouse population is at a level to allow shooting and to leave a sustainable breeding population on the ground.   This requires habitat management to achieve the required balance of heather and legal predator control to reduce predation pressure, especially from opportunists such as foxes and crows.

Many thousands of hours are therefore invested by gamekeepers and land managers working to achieve perfect conditions in which the grouse can thrive.  A spin off from management of grouse moors is that, other, less iconic but certainly more scarce species benefit hugely. 

The Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust has found that threatened wading bird species such as Golden Plover and Snipe are up to six times more likely to breed successfully on heather moorland managed by grouse keepers.  Scotland’s rolling moorland, covered in August full bloom purple heather is another world renowned iconic spin-off of the grouse shooting sector.

With economic benefits documented, community support, other species flourishing and some controversy countered, what then of the grouse themselves and the prospects for the season?

Collin Shedden of the BASC Scotland (British Association for Shooting and Conservation) states that the weather has had an impact: “We entered the winter with a good stock (of grouse), it was a benign, soft, mild winter and then what happened was heavy rain came in April, May and June as well.  So the impact of the rain has been felt by a number of estates. 

“This has impacted on the breeding success of the grouse but there are a number of areas where prospects are still looking good and we are mainly talking about the east of the country, slightly drier than the West.  We are also looking at the higher ground, usually above 1500 feet, where the effect of tick on the young grouse has been much less.”

“So in some areas where there has been good management, good stock of healthy birds, they have survived the atrocious weather.  In other areas the weather and other compounding factors have led to loss of young grouse.  Again, a mixed bag. Some areas will do OK, others will have suffered, primarily because of the rain.”

It would seem that it is not just the gamekeepers that have been in need of the wellies and waterproofs this year!

Comments  

 
# pmcrek 2012-08-12 04:37
How about we hire them all to conserve the wildlife instead?

It might even attract more tourists and money all year round than the shooting season.
 
 
# hiorta 2012-08-12 08:19
The ritual slaughter of wee birds by the 'great and good' is a sad comment on one of Scotland's lesser attractions.
 
 
# colin8652 2012-08-12 11:39
There is a place for the shooting of wee birdies by overweight men with big guns and bigger egos, it does bring in a fair bit of money But Scotland's land could be generating far far more money through more productive land use. Large tracts of land that 180 years ago were under cultivation have been allowed to go to waste by the big estates in order to rear grouse and pheasants, or to simply sit and do nothing as a tax loss against London businesses. These huge estates invest very little to NOTHING back into the communities in the form of house or land improvements but always manage to put the rents up when the tenant farmers have a good year.

The only way forward in Scotland is to set up a quango to buy estates as they come on to the market, then break them up in to lots of varying size and sell or rent them off to real people who want to live work and produce in rural Scotland, rather than the present disgusting situation where north of Dunkled, most of Scotland's land lies baron and empty.
I suppose many see empty hillsides as bonnie, I just see them as a lost opportunity to produce millions in produce for the Scottish economy.
 
 
# Jake62 2012-08-12 20:59
Goerge Monbiot's article in the Guardian recently 'Too many deer for too few people – a self-defeating study of the Highlands' was a ral eye-opener. I've always disliked grouse shooting and deer stalking due to the ruthless environmental exploitation and the elitism, but was willimg to put up with it as I believed that it brings in important money. However, Monbiot's article suggests that it's less money than thought, and that there are better ways to pay wages and encourage local businesses which would employ many more people if the land was used for other things.

tinyurl.com/bnkwc43
 
 
# brian.murray@2e2.com 2012-08-12 12:55
@Colin8652 .... Could not agree more!! Norways forestry industry is worth more than ten times that per annum ... We would have a wealthier, more productive, more sustainable and more beautiful country if we followed their example ... (hopefully reducing sheep farming at the same time)
 
 
# UpSpake 2012-08-12 17:01
Colin8652. Or simply adopt the Land Value Tax as proposed by the SDA. Allows for much fairer distribution and use of land. There will still be estates but operated much more efficiently and for the greater good of all.
 
 
# red kite 2012-08-12 18:11
I have to declare an interest in the subject. I used to make money from it. Us boys were always guaranteed a job on the days they were shooting, as beaters. The great outdoor life. At noon we'd get a hot pie, a bottle of Irn Bru, and at the end of the day sixteen shillings. The men got something warmer than Irn Bru.
And to get around, if there was space in the back of the Land Rover once the dogs were in, some of us got in too. Otherwise it was hold on outside the best you could.
I have to say it never made me a fan of the landed aristocracy !
I'll listen to the arguments against this activity, I'll give time to the arguments about alternative land use, but I won't listen to calls to stop this activity just because people don't like those who participate in it.
It takes all kinds to make a world.
Scotland is a land of many facets, we've lost too many ways of life this past century - farming has changed, transport has changed, mining, steel, ships, all gone. Build on what we have. By all means redistribute wealth, but don't throw out the baby with the bath water.
 
 
# Reid 2012-08-13 02:08
Its not all about the rich shooters.
As a teenager i loved going to the "beating"..good money and great for a restless teenage boy
 
 
# setondene 2012-08-13 21:30
This used to be the sport of the 'British' upper classes. As a schoolboy I did grouse beating and as an adult one of my first jobs was to work as an estate hand on a grouse estate. In those days (the 1960s) it was absolutely the Tory Party at play (Lord Hailsham in my case) and I seriously doubt if that has changed. Tonight I watched Cheryl Paul of STV tell us that the shooters were successful Scots, rich Americans and rich Europeans. My memory is that it was the City of London writ large as both owners and shooters but she went through contortions to avoid implicating the English while telling us we should all be grateful for the money this brings to Scotland. The Scottish Cringe writ large.

If it were not for muirburn much of our mountain area would look like norwegian forest. Muirburn removes any fertility from the soil. A norwegian politician once told me that on achieving independence (in 1905?) one of the first things the newly independent Norwegian govt did was to legislate against this type of sporting estate in order to restore forest cover. I found this interesting since I hadn't realised the Swedes were into game shooting. He told me the Swedes weren't the problem - it was the English that were buying up Norway for sporting estates, having run out of land in Scotland. I don't know whether this is true or not, but both Norwegians and Icelanders (sheep problem) seemed to be nationally obsessed with restoring trees to damaged land.

Whether this is the best use of our Highland areas will be a question only an independent Scottish govt will ever consider - it's clearly a no-go area under the Union. My old boss was a stockbroker and his pals were the same kind of bankers that ordinary people are now cursing.
 
 
# clootie 2012-08-14 15:54
Killing animals for FUN is an obscenity.

Those who hunt for food I can understand and actually have more respect for when compared to the majority who purchase a "product" in the supermarket neatly packaged.

Blasting a lifeform to bits for amusement - I will never understand.

I watch them blasting canadian geese every winter in the NE and they leave the bodies lying and injured birds trying to escape.
 
 
# Caledon 2012-08-17 16:33
Another disgusting blood 'sport'.
 
 
# Breeks 2012-08-18 13:01
I'm undecided about shooting. Without natural predation,then the deer population would need thinned out regularly, and if these 'guns for hire' are content to be relieved of healthy sums of money for the priviledge, then I'm ok with it. As for grouse and pheasants? Hmmmm....
The issue of forestry is completely different. There is only around 1% of Scotlands natural forestry still standing. This ecosystem was unique to Britain, with tall Scots Pines forming one canopy, and lower level Birches and shrubbs creating a double canopy of unique and berry rich foliage. There are similar forests in Europe, but the Scottish forest was unique due to the mild wet Atlantic weather systems and continental drift.It's no accident that Scotland has a whole different population of wild critters, from the massive Capercallie to the tiny crested tit. These birds are all rare and in trouble. For their sakes, and tourism, I would love to see that 1% of original native forest restored to 40% or even more, and restore a sustainable habitat which was, and just about still is, a unique ecosystem in the whole world. It's right here, in Scotland, and it needs to be done - now!
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments