Banner

By Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon

In the speech that the Prime Minister was due to deliver on Friday – and let me record my support for David Cameron's decision to postpone it because of the pressing urgency of the Algerian crisis – he was reportedly going to say that the UK risked "drifting towards the exit" of the European Union.

Indeed it does – underlining the point that the real question mark about Scotland's place in Europe comes from being governed by the Westminster system, and therefore from a No vote in next year's independence referendum.

I agree with Nick Clegg's comment last week that uncertainty about the UK's position in the EU could have a "chilling effect" on jobs and investment – although the irony of Mr Clegg being the Deputy Prime Minister in a government that is presiding over this very uncertainty will not be lost on people.

Being an integral part of the single European market is of particular importance to Scotland – not least because, as the Ernst & Young survey has recorded two years in a row, Scotland is the top-performing part of the UK in terms of winning inward investment jobs.

Thanks to the professionalism of our inward investment and trade promotion body Scottish Development International, Scotland succeeds disproportionately across the nations and regions of the UK in securing these new jobs.

Put bluntly, we cannot allow a situation to develop where Scotland suffers disproportionately from the "chilling effect" described by Mr Clegg.

The reality is that David Cameron is not basing his European position on the interests of the UK economy, never mind the Scottish economy. It is a crude political calculation – an attempt to concoct a formula to counteract the threat posed to Tory votes south of the Border by UKIP.

We may have something of the same opportunistic approach from Labour – earlier this month, a former Labour Party official wrote that Ed Miliband is "seriously toying with the idea of calling for an in-out referendum on Europe", on the basis that were he to "successfully outflank the Tories from the Right on such an explosive issue, the implications for David Cameron would be incalculable".

We have a different – and, I believe, better – politics in Scotland, across parties: inclusive, outward-looking and, because it is in our interests, pro-European.

We can never be complacent, but while UKIP is dictating the terms of the European debate south of the Border, it has never moved beyond the far fringes of Scottish politics.

At the last European election in 2009, UKIP moved into second place UK-wide in its share of the vote. In Scotland, it came last behind the Tories, Liberal Democrats and Greens. The party lost its deposit in every seat it contested in Scotland in the 2010 UK General Election and the 2011 Scottish Parliament election.

While it is getting record poll ratings south of the Border, in Scotland UKIP barely registers. Scotland is a European nation, and our position in the EU should not be determined by politicians at Westminster looking over their shoulder in electoral fear.

Of course, for all that they understand the economic benefits of EU membership, people also want to know that our national interests within the EU are protected.

That is why we should aspire to equality of status in Europe as an independent member state, so that we can do exactly what every other EU country does – speak with our own voice, deploy our own votes, negotiate our national priorities, and protect and promote our vital interests.

Of the 27 existing EU member states, 20 are small countries – 11 of them a similar size or smaller than Scotland. We need only look to Ireland at present – which holds the presidency of the EU for the first half of 2013 – to see the clout every country wields, regardless of size.

To a large extent, influence comes from respect – and the UK is fast losing the respect of our European friends and partners. Obama's America has added its voice to European concerns.

I believe that an independent Scotland – with our rich array of resources, talented people, and world-class learning institutions – will be a respected member of the European family. Scotland will benefit from being part of the European Union – and Europe as a whole will benefit from Scotland.

Comments  

 
# Froggit 2013-01-21 00:04
Most English people I come across in France are of the opinion that Scotland should have the right to independence!
 
 
# Yesitis 2013-01-21 01:18
Doubt over Scotland`s place in Europe comes only from Westminster

...and, of course, Westminster`s friends in Scotland: the BBC, the Scotsman, The Herald, the Daily Record...
 
 
# gerrydotp 2013-01-21 10:24
Yes - and the Westminster government, being an existing EU member state, could ask the EU for a definitive answer, but they don't. They have an interest in maintaining muddy waters.
 
 
# Am Fògarrach 2013-01-21 03:00
Ms Sturgeon says "Being an integral part of the single European market is of particular importance to Scotland – not least because, as the Ernst & Young survey has recorded two years in a row, Scotland is the top-performing part of the UK in terms of winning inward investment jobs."

Ms Sturgeon seems unaware that independent Scotland does not have to be in the EU to be an integral part of the single European market. Being in EFTA has all the trade benefits the EU. Articles 99 and 100 of the EEA’s founding Agreement require that EFTA members of the EEA have exactly the same rights as EU members. All the EFTA members are represented individually on the EEA’s governing bodies, including the EEA Court of Justice, but EU members are represented collectively by the EU Commission.

Scotland would be truly independent in EFTA. Being in the EU would be merely exchanging its Westminster overlord for one in Brussels.
 
 
# .Scot 2013-01-21 10:23
Quoting Am Fògarrach:
Ms Sturgeon seems unaware that:

Scotland would be truly independent in EFTA. Being in the EU would be merely exchanging its Westminster overlord for one in Brussels.


Are you unaware that Scotland is already (who was it who said) "at the heart of Europe"? I have noted that a negligence of this is a common problem with the Say NO branch.

Scots can only democratically decide to leave the EU if we win independence. Because we are already IN European treaty and the superfluous UK, Scots have no say in anything within the UK. At present every single person in Scotland could vote to stay in the EU treaty but we can easily be voted out from that other part of needless wee Union. The EU makes the UK membership, utterly superfluous and undemocratic. don't swap democracy for the Union Flegq!
 
 
# James 2013-01-21 10:50
Scotland is NOT a member of the European Union or any other international organisation at the moment. And please stop referring to the EU as "Europe". It is the smallest of all the European organisations and covers only half of the continent.

Am Fògarrach is right. The SNP has never come up with a single reason why Scotland should be in the EU at all. We don't need it for economic reasons - in fact it is an economic millstone round Scotland's neck at the moment. If there are any non-economic reasons why Scotland should join, then let's hear them. We are still waiting for Nicola Sturgeon to explain herself, something that all the verbiage above fails to do.

The 30-member "European" Single Market is the European Economic Area (EEA), and we don't need to be in the EU to join that. EFTA also offers us free trade with the other half of Europe that is not in the EU, as well as most of the world. We would be daft to choose the EU in that face of that.
 
 
# Leader of the Pack 2013-01-21 12:20
"Being in the EU would be merely exchanging its Westminster overlord for one in Brussels."

For that to be true all the nations in the EU would have to be giving their entire GDP up to Brussels in exchange for a block grant and be in a Parliament where 95% representation was Belgian! Is that the case?
That worthless UKIP argument trying to compare Scotlands position in Europe with their position in the UK doesnt wash. An Independent Scotlands position in the EU would be no more restictive than their membership of the UN or Nato. The only comparrison that can be made with Scotlands place in the UK is if they had decided to join the Soviet Union instead. Then youd have a case for swapping like for like.
 
 
# Am Fògarrach 2013-01-21 20:01
Leader of the Pack -

You say "An Independent Scotlands position in the EU would be no more restictive than their membership of the UN or Nato."

You are mistaken, The EU Court has ruled that EU law (acquis communautaire) is superior to ALL national constitutional law. Absolutely nothing in the Scottish legal tradition would be sacred.

The imperialist EU will be able to do anything it likes, thereby perpetuating its bureaucratic, corrupt and often incompetent existence.

Neither the UN or NATO or any other organisation could overrule independent Scotland's constitutional law.
 
 
# James 2013-01-21 21:58
Unfortunately, that is not true. The EU differs from every other international organisation in the world in the respect that it is the only one that purports to exercise sovereignty over its members. All the others from the UN down, including the major European institutions, are run on an intergovernment al basis, but the EU demands direct rule over its members.

There are good reasons why the EU covers only half of Europe (its use of the expression "European" for its Parliament and other institutions is pure fiction) and why its expansion after coming July has hit the buffers. Not in their wildest dreams would the Russians and a number of other important European nations consider EU membership.

It is also not in Scotland's interests. Nicola Sturgeon knows perfectly well that what she is stating about the Single Market is untrue. EU membership is not necessary for Scottish access to it. Indeed it would block trading access on a much wider basis.
 
 
# gedguy2 2013-01-21 06:37
The Tories are frightened of the UKIP effect. In marginal constituencies, in England, the UKIP vote could take the seat off the Tories and give it to Labour. This is what frightens them. Not the economy, not jobs, not concern for the rights of the citizens of this country, (or should I say subjects?) but how their party will fare in the next general election.
 
 
# Displaced Patriot 2013-01-21 07:22
How refreshing to read he balanced comments of Nicola.
When she or any other SNP Politicians speak it is always about what is best for Scotland and the people who live there.
So it is with sadness that when you listen to unionist politicians from either side of the border their only interest is their own party and how best to get the big boys seat at Westminster.
 
 
# UpSpake 2013-01-21 08:16
This viewpoint coming from a convinced Europhile is just that, a viewpoint. I simply cannot accept that Euroscepticism is unique to our neighbours south of the border and to describe those who have no truck with the EU as the far distant of Scottish politics is merely dismissive.
If Nicola agrees with the observation that the Bitter Together lot have no case to argue for the Union with England then I challenge the SNP to articulate the benifits of being in the EU. Let's start first with the benifits to our fishing industry.
 
 
# gedguy2 2013-01-21 09:33
You seem to forget, UpSpake, that our fishing rights were given away by the UK Government. Whereas, in an independent Scotland, we will re-negotiate this selling off of our fishing rights to protect the financial centre in London.
At this moment in time we have 6 seats in the EU under the auspices of the UK when other EU countries of a similar size to us have 13. Therefore we will have a greater say for Scotland than we did being part of the UK.
 
 
# Angus 2013-01-21 08:27
Karel Schwarzenberg on the radio, said Scotland needs England so the UK can have more clout in the EU.
The only conclusion I could come to is that Mr Schwarzenberg knows nothing about Scotland.
His message indicates that the rUK will be weak! So contrary to Westminster's message that Scotland is a subsidy junkie, we can take from his words that Scotland keeps the UK afloat?
The BBC also presented him as the Czech republic's prime minister, he is the deputy prime minister.
 
 
# James 2013-01-21 11:12
Schwarzenberg will be the next President of the Czech Republic. I never yet met a Central European politician who had much of an inkling about Scotland, or the UK for that matter. The EU and the Euro were designed for Central Europe, and we have all witnessed the disaster (fisheries, Greece, etc.) arising out of a misguided attempt to extend them to the different framework conditions on the periphery of the continent. None of the other, much larger, European institutions falls into that error.
 
 
# Ken Mac 2013-01-21 13:37
Actually he is the Foreign Minister though he may also hold the post of Deputy Prime Minister and it's not MR Schwarzenberg it's Karel, Prince of Schwarzenberg,D uke of Krumlov to you mate.
 
 
# Triangular Ears 2013-01-21 17:27
Did anyone notice that the BBC, in their reports from Slovakia and the Czech Republic, failed to bring up the currency issue? Why did Glenn Campbell not ask why Slovakia has adopted the Euro but the Czech Republic hasn't?

The inconvenient truth for Campbell is that the Czech Republic hasn't been forced to take the Euro, contrary to what BBC Pravda are telling Scots about what would happen to Scotland. The Czech Republic, having not been a member as Czechoslovakia, was also in the weakened position of negotiating from outside the EU.

Campbell also failed to point out, or ask his interviewees about, the fact that Czechoslovakia was not an EU member and that THIS is why Slovakia's membership was not guaranteed. There's also the small matter of them being a former communist economy transitioning to capitalism.

More BBC lies by omission.
 
 
# Hillside 2013-01-22 00:26
I agree, but having just read the article by Glenn Campbell on BBC News website, it actually makes a pretty good case for Scottish independence. Both countries admitted to the EU; Better relations between the two than before independence; No double dip recession (unlike in the UK), and most telling - No desire in either country for reunification. I visited Czech republic recently and thought it a confident and forward looking country. I am glad to see that their positive experience is finally being discussed in relation to the Scottish independence debate. Maybe even Glenn is starting to see that independence makes sense!
 
 
# gus1940 2013-01-21 10:21
Following Obama's comments last week re UK membership of The EU I presume that it follows that he believes that an Independent Scotland should be a member of The EU.
 
 
# James 2013-01-21 11:45
Not necessarily. Scotland in EFTA and the rest-UK in the EU would both still be in the European Economic Area and therefore in the same trading bloc, with no intermediate barriers.

The EFTA states would welcome Scotland as strengthening their position. The UK, on the other hand, would not be welcome as an EFTA member, because its disproportionat e size would upset EFTA's internal balance, and the UK's declining economy would drag the other members down with it.

The Norwegian Foreign Minister said recently that the UK should remain in the EU. For diplomatic reasons he could not say the "rest-UK", but the inference was obvious.
 
 
# gus1940 2013-01-21 12:08
Read my comment - it refers to Obama - no mention of EFTA.
 
 
# James 2013-01-21 14:01
Sorry if I did not make myself clear. The Obama Administration is well informed about developments in Scotland, including the strong and growing move for Scottish membership of EFTA/EEA instead of the EU. That would not in itself disturb the Americans, any more than Norway's status does, providing the remainder of the UK stays in the EU.
 
 
# Leader of the Pack 2013-01-21 12:42
Folk on this blog seem to be arguing about the merits or demerits of EU membership when they should be concentrating purely on obtaining first of all the choice to determine their own future in or out of the EU. It is pointless debating about the consequences of decisions that are out of your hands. The time for arguing the case for in or out of the EU is post Independence not now on the run up to the biggest decision Scotland has to make in over 300 years. Right now the EU is nothing but a distraction to that decision and is being used to scaremonger Scots into voting no. The only message regarding the EU at present which should be broadcasted is the fact that we dont have the choice of membership while only having 5% representation within Westminster.
 
 
# dadsarmy 2013-01-21 12:46
I would like to see at least the option of EFTA explored by the SNP and SG, but certainly by the YES campaign. There is a presumption by the SNP that we all want to be in the EU, and this needs to be re-evaluated.

I'd like to see though how it works for us in the EU, so I guess my position is clear. If indeed we are "allowed" to stay "automatically" in the EU on very similar terms to now, then so be it, have a referendum on if we want to stay, around 2018 or 2020. Perhaps with our own negotiators at the EU we can get better terms than now, and work closer within the EU (though not the United States of EU - eueuecchh).

If on the other hand we have to re-apply then no, we tell the EU to get lost and we join EFTA.
 
 
# Leader of the Pack 2013-01-21 12:58
The EU is only as good or bad as its members make it to be.
 
 
# Am Fògarrach 2013-01-22 01:19
Leader of the Pack 2013-01-21 11:58 -
Yes, that's true. They have made a very poor job of it, don't you think?
 
 
# Dundonian West 2013-01-21 16:31
OT.Nicola Sturgeon has added a new piece to her blog.
A choice of two futures.
Interesting.
scotreferendum.com/.../...
 
 
# sneckedagain 2013-01-21 22:33
Leader of the Pack

Well said. Another irrelevant diversion, led of course by Upspake.

The whole debate is a unionist diversion to keep us talking about issues that divide us.

The notion, of course, that the EU would want Scotland out of it is absurd.
An independent Scotland will be able to chose its future from that position.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments