An open letter written by Humza Yousaf MSP calling for Glasgow City Council to refuse permission for the Scottish Defence League (SDL) to hold a public procession through Glasgow’s streets has been signed by party leaders across the political spectrum, representatives from trade unions and faith groups in Scotland.
The Scottish Defence League, an offshoot of the English Defence League, have an application making its way through Glasgow City Council to march on February 25th.
Commenting, Humza Yousaf said:
“I am a firm believer in free speech – regardless of how unsavoury it may be. However, it is imperative freedom of speech is not at the expense of public safety. The SDL must not be given free rein on our streets to peddle their toxic hatred.
“It is perverse that the SDL application to march along our city will go through Nelson Mandela Place. We have seen previous defence league marches end in violence as mindless thugs go on the rampage against shopkeepers, businesses and innocent bystanders.
“Politicians, trade unions and faith groups have come together on a collective platform to vigorously oppose any march organised by the SDL through the streets of Glasgow. I am sure the City Council will see the strength of feeling opposing this procession of hatred and refuse the SDL application.'
Human rights lawyer and organiser of Scotland United Aamer Anwar said:
“Neo Nazis masquerading under the flag of Scotland are not welcome in our city. Once again Scotland is united in demanding that any march be refused by the Council. These violent racist thugs must never be allowed to incite hatred against any section of our communities.”
The letter:
We the undersigned express our extreme concern at our streets being used for the peddling of hatred. We vigorously oppose giving the Scottish Defence League (SDL), or any of their offshoots, permission to hold a public procession through Glasgow.
We understand that an application has gone in to Glasgow City Council and that the SDL are in discussions with the police and the local authority. We urge all authorities to reject this application on the grounds of public safety and moral decency.
With previous SDL and EDL processions we have witnessed mindless thugs attack shopkeepers, business owners and taxi drivers. While we passionately defend freedom of speech – regardless of how unpleasant it may be – we do not believe vile, toxic hate should be given free rein in our streets.
Glasgow has a proud history of fighting fascism and tackling racism. We are proud of our multicultural diversity and as such we wish to send out a loud and clear message that racism is not welcome in our city.
We seek your assurances that these concerns will be taken on board and that any application for the Scottish Defence League to march in our city’s streets will be rejected.
Signatories
While we passionately defend freedom of speech – regardless of how unpleasant it may be – we do not believe vile, toxic hate should be given free rein in our streets.
A couple of years ago my wife and I were cycling in Kilmarnock when we got caught up one of these rallies we didn't know was on. The BNP, or whatever guise they were taking that day, speaker asked for support and someone passing by shouted 'Support, ah widnae ge ye the reek aff ma shite ya bastard' at which point everyone else started laughing at them.
as a former police officer (I think I remember, sorry if I got that wrong) I'd have thought you'd be well versed in what these scum bags stand for.
Note the racial hatred, intimidation and threatening behaviour in many of the EDL clips.
Surf the web further and find their web sites full of photographs of human rights activists, politicians, anti-war activists, journalists and charity workers, complete with requests for phone numbers and addresses
I was and I recall standing between the BNP or some similar nazi group and a coalition of left wing and anti-nazi league groups in Glasgow. The nazis were having a demo and the rest were out to protest. My job, and that of my colleagues was to make sure they both got what a democracy promises. At one point things got heated and we had to hold them apart (this was before the days of crash helmets and riot shields). The group on one side were kicking and punching us calling us illegitimate procreational lovers of people from the Indian sub- continent, the ones on the other side were punching and kicking us calling us Thatcher's boot boys. Two things went through my mind...you couldn't actually tell what group was what without the banners, all they were wanting was a bit of public disorder and that we must have been doing something right if both lots were beating on us.
Don't get their illegal and criminal activities confused with their right to discuss their twisted views.
All I really want to say is that you cannot call a state democratic when you pick and choose who is allowed to exercise the right of free speech. Because then speech isn't free is it?