by Paul Kavanagh

Murphy's law is one of the immutable laws of nature.  It states with an elegant scientific certainty that if a Scottish Labour politician drops the jeelie piece of the party's internal review onto the electoral hopes of Ed Miliband, it will fall jeelie side down and they'll be spending the next five hours trying to remove the stain before Ed gets home.

Meanwhile they've been so preoccupied that they forgot to take the Member for West of Scotland Safe Seat for walkies and he's peed all over the hallway, and no one has given Labour's pensioned-off peers their happy pills and they're dribbling all over the sofa.

Ed's already had a bad week.  He needs the Murphy review to go well because he had a rough time at the hands of the trade unions.  He'll be so miffed when he finds out it's all gone pear shaped that he'll make those strange chopping movements with his hands that his media advisors tell him look decisive.  Sadly they really make him look like one like one of those demented puppets from an old children's TV programme, the sort we now know were written by people who were stoned out of their trees throughout the 1960s.  He's not so much Red Ed as a kind of adenoidal Captain Scarlett with a spaceship on a piece of string.

This week we saw Captain Scarlett on amphetamines as Ed addressed the TUC conference.  He was telling the unions that he wouldn't support strike action against Tory cuts, which is a bit like telling the Knights of St Columba that they should consider joining the Masons because they do a nicer buffet.  It wasn't going well.  Ed's chopping gestures were threatening to get out of control, causing injury to the front three rows in the conference centre.  Half the union delegates were praying for Thunderbird 2 to arrive with Virgil to the rescue, the other half were plotting where to find scissors to cut Ed's strings.  

Without the support of the unions, Ed's prospects of getting the key to No 10 depends even more heavily on the party doing well in Scotland.  Scots and the unions have traditionally been the two groups whose votes Labour could rely on no matter how much the party crapped on them.  So it was all the more important that the party's Scottish review went well.  Scotland's role in Labour's eyes is to act as Ed's springboard into power in Westminster.  Labour sees Holyrood not as the democratic voice of the Scottish people but rather as a sort of giant bouncy castle full of inflated Labour egos.  At least they have the second part of that right.

But it's only been a few days and the vultures are circling.  Already figures in the Labour party are distancing themselves from the Murphy review like members of Edinburgh council's transport committee being presented with a tram bill.  

The MP for East Kilbride Michael McCann led a chorus of protests from Labour's dinosaur faction, objecting that the review's proposals left no room for a pterodactyl to land and threatened to knock tyrannosaurus rex off its position at the top of the food chain.  It was those pesky little Holyrood rodents that got us into this mess, he harrumphed, and now the whole party was expected to pay for the installation of a hamster's wheel.  Labour's defeat in the May election had nothing to do with them having rubbish policies which were dictated from London and everything to do with the lack of gravitas in Holyrood compared to the stellar talents of Magrit Curran and Baron Salwar's wee boy who grace the benches of Westminster.  Michael is confused on the distinction between gravitas and a well-upholstered backside paid for on expenses and secured by party connections.  

Michael is not averse to using his own gravitas to further good causes.  In February, the BBC noted that when he was a councillor and member of South Lanarkshire's planning and estates committee he had on numerous occasions supported planning applications put forward by his good pal property developer and Labour party donor James Kean, omitting to mention that they were best buddies.  As an MP Michael wrote a long and detailed letter to Scottish Enterprise, intervening in a planning application that could see his pal benefit to the tune of a few million quid.  The letter concerned a bid by Asda to build a supermarket in East Kilbride and detailed 33 questions opposing it.  Had the deal gone through it would have put the kybosh on a deal Mr Kean was planning with rival Tesco.  

Of course nothing untoward is being alleged.  Heaven forfend you should even think such a thing.  Michael has gravitas, remember, and simply prefers Tesco own-brand beans to the Asda variety.  But perhaps if Labour devoted as much energy and attention to the concerns and desires of ordinary Scottish voters as they do to those of millionaire property developers and donors to the Labour party they might not be held in quite the contempt that they are today.  This point was strangely absent both from Murphy's review and from Michael's hysterical overreaction.  But to be fair to him, any reduction in the standing of Labour's Westminster MPs might have a serious effect on his ability to intervene in planning decisions about baked beans, so we can appreciate his concern.

Michael also asserted that the real reason Labour lost the May election was because they had adopted SNP policies.  They'd obviously not adopted them very well mind, as the SNP also adopted SNP policies but did markedly better.  This was because the SNP were more populist, Michael averred.  This is why Michael has gravitas you see, as only from the lofty heights of Westminster could it be discerned that the SNP did better at the election because more people voted for them.  Michael believes Labour ought to revert to being unpopulist as this will make them more popular.  

It was left to Sarah Boyack to go on Newsnicht to tell Raymond Buchanan in a flat monotone voice how exciting these exciting changes were that were exciting her so much.  Sounding like a tired parent trying to persuade the kiddies that a visit to the Thimble and Knitting Pattern Museum was much more fun than going to Alton Towers, she spoke with all the conviction of a Mormon missionary putting across the case for gay sex orgies and atheism.

Sarah told Raymond that the party has decided on radical changes hitherto unseen in Labour history and they planned to redecorate John Smith House in some lovely new wallpaper from IKEA and tart up the soft furnishings.  They may also possibly move the potted plants, but that will depend upon the agreement of the Westminster party.  The BBC demonstrated its commitment to holding all political parties equally to account when Raymond raised an eyebrow at the notion that the Busy Lizzie would look better in the foyer.

At least the Tories were imaginative enough to say that they wanted a whole new name for their party, even if they weren't quite imaginative enough to think of one just at the moment.  Complex concepts are a bit much for Scottish Tories, and they're still waiting to get the Scrabble set back from Michael Gove so they can rearrange the tiles in order to find a new title.  Murdo Fraser would like a name with z's and x's in it, as these are high scoring letters and will assuredly increase the Tories' vote share.  

The Tories have been driven to such desperate measures since they're represented in Westminster by English public schoolboys who bray like epileptic donkeys on a nitrous-oxide ventilator when Scots ask things like: "Well why can't Scotland control its own oil revenues then?"  Cameron thinks this is a stupid question that deserves a stupid answer.  Just the other week Cameron warned us uppity Scots that his "respect agenda" cut both ways.  We know, Dave.  We know.

The Tories in Scotland have much to distance themselves from, but when it comes to putting a few light years between themselves and unpopular policies and colleagues the Tories are rank amateurs compared to Jim Murphy, of whom there's been no verified sighting since Labour's review was launched.  

Jim Murphy did find time to grandly tell us in a press release issued in a plain brown envelope with no return address that Labour would no longer be the Scottish Labour Party, but Scotland's Labour Party.  That makes all the difference then.  In Labour's next manifesto we can look forward to a proposal to change the name British Telecom to Britain's Telecom as this will reduce phone bills and will allow us to speak to a real live human being when we phone in to complain.  But other than his hit-and-run press release there's been nary a word from the bold Jim.

Murphy hasn't said anything to support, defend, or even acknowledge the existence of the review that's got his name on it.  Jim Murphy's greatest talent by far is putting a distance between himself and a political car crash.  He's even capable of distancing himself from himself, which has a quantum warp effect on space and time.  This is Murphy's second law.  

The reason he's currently invisible is that he's passed into a strange topsy-turvy alternate reality where Ed Miliband is Iron Man, Ed Balls has never said a bad word about anyone, Michael Martin is erudite and articulate, there really is a positive case to be made for the Union, and people outside BBC Scotland take the Labour party seriously.  Jim quite likes it there.  If we're really lucky, the fabric of the universe will not twang like a knicker elastic and snap him back into a television studio on Pacific Quay.

Comments  

 
# chicmac 2011-09-15 22:27
"He's not so much Red Ed as a kind of adenoidal Captain Scarlett with a spaceship on a piece of string."

Well, IMHO, he bears more resemblance to the penguin 'McGraw' from Wallace and Grommit.

i51.photobucket.com/.../...
 
 
# Mei 2011-09-17 12:30
This is the voice of the Mysterons. LOL
 
 
# Robabody 2011-09-15 22:43
"The BBC demonstrated its commitment to holding all political parties equally to account when Raymond raised an eyebrow at the notion that the Busy Lizzie would look better in the foyer." Stop it I'm sore laughing - first class!
 
 
# clootie 2011-09-16 06:40
Paul - Very, very funny!
A great start to the day - thank you.
My favourite
It was left to Sarah Boyack to go on Newsnicht to tell Raymond Buchanan in a flat monotone voice how exciting these exciting changes were that were exciting her so much.......... "
 
 
# Jim Johnston 2011-09-16 07:35
Very nicely put Paul.
(re Knights of St Columba / Masons, I'm sure you're not implying that in any way shape or form the Westminster "A Team" conform to Masonic principles.)
 
 
# Robert Louis 2011-09-16 07:47
Excellentt funny article. This line, regarding 'red' Ed is first class;


"He was telling the unions that he wouldn't support strike action against Tory cuts, which is a bit like telling the Knights of St Columba that they should consider joining the Masons because they do a nicer buffet."

Was it not the unions block vote that ensure 'red' Ed became Labour leader. Why do the unions still support Labour?
 
 
# Barontorc 2011-09-16 08:23
It's the only show in england-town.
 
 
# Arbroath1320 2011-09-16 11:36
ROFLMFAO! :D

Woah there Paul, I think you've overdone it with the funny pills this morning. :D

GREAT article.

I need to go lie down now to let my aching sides recover. :D
 
 
# Training Day 2011-09-16 11:45
'He's even capable of distancing himself from himself'

It's funny 'cos it's true Paul!
 
 
# dogbite 2011-09-16 12:06
Paul
I love this line
'only from the lofty heights of Westminster could it be discerned that the SNP did better at the election because more people voted for them
Pure genius because it is so true.
 
 
# Caadfael 2011-09-16 12:06
O/T
Another smile for today, Scotgold, the operators of the goldmine at Cononish, Tyndrum, had a good RNS which has pushed the share price by some 27%.
Buy them now folks while they're cheap!
More good news for Scotland!
shareprice.co.uk/.../...
 
 
# clootie 2011-09-16 12:23
Did you learn nothing from Gordon Brown!

You buy high and sell low! It worked with gold and saved the world.
 
 
# Jim Johnston 2011-09-16 18:50
Thanks Caadfael.
Checked them out.

I owe you one.
 
 
# Roll_On_2011 2011-09-17 03:50
Caadfael

O/T
Another smile for today, Scotgold, the operators of the goldmine at Cononish, Tyndrum, had a good RNS which has pushed the share price by some 27%.
Buy them now folks while they're cheap!
More good news for Scotland!
shareprice.co.uk/.../...



Aye Caadfael there is an article in the Herald about their success:

heraldscotland.com/.../...
 
 
# Caadfael 2011-09-17 06:57
You're welcome guys, get stuck in!
It would really put Scotland on the map if we made our own native metals medals for the Glasgow Games!
 
 
# Stiubhart 2011-09-16 12:22
Almost cured my bad back Paul.
Just read Craig Murray too.. craigmurray.org.uk/.../...
Delightful reading
 
 
# cirsium 2011-09-16 17:42
thanks for an enjoyable read, Paul.

Also, thanks for this link Stiubhart. "The almost 100% correlation today between unionism and neo-conservatism among professional politicians and media pundits is why I am absolutely confident Scotland will achieve independence very soon. That neo-con recipe is well and truly rejected by the Scottish people."
 
 
# Alx1 2011-09-16 21:58
Stiubhart,

Excellent link thanks.

Newsnet should set up a close relationship with this website as
we have more in common with these people than they realise!
Most of the comments were actually quite sensible, which makes a change from the usual ignorant racist slurs we see in other blogs/journals.

Mr Paul Kavanagh

I have said this many times before, in one form or another, in your early contributions.

You have the gift of getting the message over with the wit of a comedian.
Please keep it up and please contribute a lot more.
 
 
# GrassyKnollington 2011-09-16 14:10
Lol great stuff Paul, in fact you're getting so good I'm worried you'll be head hunted by The Herald to write an anodyne paragraph about fish fingers, sausages or sparrows like the wasted political talent that is poor Rab.

I can only assume his political sketches were unwelcome there and he was ordered to keep it bland.

If they do call, in the name of all that's blue and flag shaped, just say no.
 
 
# whitburnsfinest 2011-09-16 20:41
Quoting GrassyKnollingt on:
in the name of all that's blue and flag shaped


GK, ta for the giggle... I love that!

Brillian article as always Paul....sometimes the whole unionist thing is just so ridiculous you can't do anything BUT make fun of it...and they make it so easy too! :-D
 
 
# robmcdonald 2011-09-16 14:30
Fabulous stuff Paul, I can just hear the deep echoing tones saying, " This is the voice of the Unionists, we know that you can hear us Scotsmen, our next strike is imminent, we will show you how weak you really are, in the next four years we will destroy any credibility we ever had....we will be avenged"
www.youtube.com/.../
 
 
# Holebender 2011-09-16 15:28
HaHaHa... All your base are belong to us!

www.youtube.com/.../
 
 
# oldnat 2011-09-16 17:49
Over on Labour Hame, Murphy has revealed a bold strategy to lose Westminster seats as well.

A really significant change is the switch of party structures to Holyrood boundaries instead of Westminster parliamentary seats. Not everyone will be keen, but the evidence on this was clear and it was why I changed my view on it to champion the change. Taking the example of our review co-chair, Sarah Boyack MSP, when Sarah tried to build a campaign team she had to go in search of volunteers across five Westminster seats that her seat touched on. In short, our structures hampered our campaign.

We shouldn’t kid ourselves, however, that moving to Holyrood seats as the unit of organisation deals with the problem. In truth it probably displaces our difficulties. In future it will be MPs that have to build a campaign team from across a myriad of smaller MSP seats that their expanded Westminster constituencies cover. However it’s the right change for Scottish Labour and will make us more competitive in our most contested elections. MPs are elected in a British general election where there is a higher turnout amongst the voters and our volunteers. It’s just a truth that there is greater energy in the UK election – even if some wish it wasn’t the case.


Organise around the Holyrood elections, for which he assures us in Labour there is less energy (not zero energy, of course, since at any higher temperature than -273.15K even a BritNat has some "vibrational energy.")

Thus, when it comes to Westminster elections, they won't be able to find their activists who will be happily (and hopefully quietly) vibrating away in their Holyrood constituencies with greater energy.
 
 
# ianbeag 2011-09-16 18:28
Great piece of writing Paul and loaded with humour. You will have lots more to poke fun at before the final selection of Labour's Council candidates in Glasgow who are turning cartwheels in defence of their exalted roles as we speak.
 
 
# derek 2011-09-16 18:52
Good article and well written, however I'd say it would enlighten the blog if it could get some of the SNP MSP's to do a few articles and even reply to the comments.
 
 
# Alx1 2011-09-16 22:09
Hi derek,

I agree with you there, but as I understand it newsnet is trying to be impartial!
Newsnetscotland , in the past, have had a few contributions from SNP politicians, as well as other politicians from other parties.
Only today I was thinking the exact same!
I also see newsnet's point that they try to stay as non aligned as possible.

But you are right, a few contributions from SNP politicians, or others, wouldn't go amiss.

How about it newsnet?

Sorry for edit. To many sherbets and all that. :-)
 
 
# derek 2011-09-16 22:29
Thanks Alx1, I think it's important not to separate politicians and voters.
 
 
# GrassyKnollington 2011-09-16 22:20
Hi Derek, Labour Hame was specifically set up by a Labour MP. Newsnet is pro independence but isn't officially linked to the Scottish National Party.

If it had been set up by Angus Robertson he might be able to pull in a few pals in the style of Bomber Harris but it's not that kind of site.
 
 
# derek 2011-09-16 22:34
Hi GrassyKnollingt on, I see your point.
I'm kind of thinking that there are divisions on thinking between party members and party representatives , politics can be complex and tricky to understand, so I believe that the exchange and interaction of members, representatives , supporters and interested parties would bring better understanding and more focused debates.
 
 
# InfrequentAllele 2011-09-16 23:20
Hi Derek,

As GK says we are not affiliated to any political party. I flatter myself that I am a party animal, but only parties of a very different sort. I even know how to do the Purcell Bounce you referred to on another thread. It's a dance that involves sticking rolled up tenners up your nose whilst gyrating in a property developer's lap.

But I digress.

Newsnet has a standing invitation to Scottish political parties to use our pages to put across their point of view. Occasionally we do get pieces from MSPs. Pete Wishart has published a few articles here, and so has Joan McAlpine. Even His Eckness himself once graced our pages and we were all very happy and our mammies were dead impressed.

Patrick Harvie of the Greens has written for us too as has Colin Fox of the SSP. We're happy to publish contributions from Labour, the Conservatives as well - and even the Lib Dems if we could find a live one.

We're not even necessarily a pro-independence site. We're pro-Scottish, we want what is best for Scotland and for ordinary Scottish people. At the moment that seems to be independence because no one is coming forward to articulate this "positive case for the Union" that they keep telling us that they're going to tell us.

I have a feeling that if there really was a positive case for the Union we'd have heard all about it by now.

Paul Kavanagh
 
 
# Alx1 2011-09-16 23:36
Aye awright Paul, jist wit I wis sayin before, albiet in idiot form.

:-)

Keep up the excellent work Paul.
 
 
# GrassyKnollington 2011-09-17 13:49
can't disagree with that Derek. I think it's a pity more people haven't been able to find time to share their thoughts with us and engage in some debate.
 
 
# derek 2011-09-16 23:34
Thanks for the clarity Paul, the Purcell bounce, LoL, it might even had been GB's super trendy toilet roll but his farther would disagree?

Well, that's a good solid invitation and an a decent varied mixture.

I guess all Scots want a better Scotland, well unless your names Danny Alexander that is but I'm a bit clouded to the means? after all there are some cracking posters here, who have the potential to shape good policy view and direction.

But hey ho! if it's just an infrequent place to zip off some temper, then who I'm I to question just a place?
 
 
# Arbroath1320 2011-09-17 10:55
Could this piece explain Skelator Man's non appearance on a recent Newsnight programme? :D

bbc.co.uk/.../...

It explains a lot to me. :D
 
 
# Barontorc 2011-09-17 11:54
C'mon Arbroath - a little more info pls - can't see any connection apart from the address.

If there's muck about let's get spreading it's good for development.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments