Banner

By Gerry Hassan, The Scotsman, January 5th 2013

The Scottish experience like most places is filled with myths and delusions about who we are and what it says about us.

Unlike other places, Scotland also seems to have a deep-seated conservatism, lack of curiosity in others, and a profound insularity which sees Scotland as exceptional and unique.

This spreads across the political spectrum, from complacent social democrats to safety-first nationalists and unionists who never acknowledge that in the last two decades 24 new nation states have emerged from the end of the Soviet Bloc.

There is a powerful example of a nation which has tried to confront its own delusions sitting nearby: Ireland. It like us bought into the illusion of the never ending boom, fantasyland economics, property bubbles, and a culture of self-aggrandisement and self-promotion. Ireland endured a spectacular economic and banking crisis which also brought the political system and Fianna Fail’s decades long system of patronage, down with it.

The election of Michael D. Higgins as Irish President in 2011 – a socialist, poet and philosopher – and constant critic during the ‘good times’ of the ‘Celtic Tiger’ shows in the way Mary Robinson’s election in 1990 did, a society which has the determination to change.

There have been other examples with books, research and thinking on what all this means, most notably Fintan O’Toole, writer for the ‘Irish Times’ and his two best-selling books on the crisis, ‘Ship of Fools’ and “Enough is Enough’.

In ‘Ship of Fools’, O’Toole notes that what people did not take cognisance of was that ‘there was a price to be paid for skipping modernity’. This was that ‘large chunks of classic democracy were missing’ such as a proper ‘shift from religious authority to public and civic morality’.

His prospectus for change involves acknowledging the attempts by the Irish establishment to get the old show back on the road. ‘Nothing will change unless politics are reinvented’ he writes in the later ‘Enough is Enough’. This begins he believes with accepting that ‘five underlying ‘truths’ of Irish politics are not true at all’, namely, the myth of the republic, representation, parliamentary democracy, charity and wealth.

And he poses five things for ‘a new Irish Republic’ – security, health, education, equality and citizenship for every citizen. In the book’s conclusion he expands this to a manifesto for remaking Irish society in fifty items, most of which would not look out of place written about Scotland.

It is a salutary example for Scotland. We too were in the grip of collective delusion and have experienced the shock of the crash with RBS and HBOS. We also have a political and business establishment eager for restoration.

A Scottish revisionism would reflect that our home truths – egalitarianism, the democratic intellect and popular sovereignty – are myths and folklore. They make us feel comfortable and different, but they do not inform our practices.

What would a Scottish agenda for, if not ‘a new Scottish republic’, then ‘a new democracy’ look like? Five items like O’Toole should be enough to map out a radical break with the failed past and a different future. First, is political economy, the subject Scotland gave to the world through Adam Smith and others.

New Labour stopped talking about this, and Scottish politics have been disfigured by the pork barrel practices of the Block Grant and Barnett. We need to talk political economy, what business ethics and models should look like, and address the limits of Anglo-American hyper-capitalism.

Second, there is the issue of democracy and government. Scotland has never become in its history a fully-fledged democracy, with nearly one million Scots missing from our public debates: the younger, poorer ‘forgotten Scotland’. At the same time, as government has grown and got more invasive, it has centralised and standardised.

A good example is that until the 1940s local government was a rich patchwork of hundreds of authorities, whereas now we have 32 and maybe soon less. There is a direct relationship between this centralisation and our truncated, atrophied democracy.

Third, we need a social vision. We have at least two generations who have experienced systemic unemployment, exclusion and being marginalised and written off, while we have public health inequalities which go back to the first urbanisation of the West of Scotland. We even have some world-class research on this, but we don’t do anything about it; we don’t connect the policy evidence to the practice to mobilising agencies, government and people to heal our fractured Scotland.

Fourth, public life is not all about politics and we have to recognise the relevance of the personal, relationships and psychology. Across too much Scotland there us a deficit in empathy, respect and understanding others from our most deprived areas to TV studios and newspaper columns. And some of this has a gendered dimension in that some Scottish men seem to have a problem with modern life.

Finally, all of the above links to where Scotland wants to position itself geo-politically. We will always be part of ‘the Anglosphere’, the English speaking democracies of the world, as Ireland has post-independence. But we can accentuate our other traditions and influences: as a Northern neighbour of our Nordic friends, and as a proud European nation and partner.

Lets borrow from inspiring examples from our neighbours, The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund gives a percentage of its funds to address international conflicts; we could do the same with an Oil Fund for the Mind at home and abroad. The Finns, a society even more authority and permission based than Scotland saw their government launch ‘Mission for Finland 2030’, an imaginative exercise on the future, which they handed over to others. And the Icelanders have just crowdsourced their new constitution, showing that you don’t need to continually invoke the memory of the Scottish Constitutional Convention to realise a participatory democracy.

A challenge to all the politicos, professional and non-professional, over the next two years is to look at our myths and delusions, challenge them, and break out of our comfort zones and insularity.

Our political destiny and choice cannot be between a SNP vision for Scotland as a self-governing Parliament and one public authority for each service delivery, police, fire, social work, health, in an independent nation, and a Labour vision exactly the same, but sitting in the union.

Others are embracing more far-reaching, meaningful change: Ireland, Norway, Finland and Iceland. Lets join our northern friends and neighbours and finally start up a new Scottish democracy.


Courtesy of Gerry Hassan - http://gerryhassan.com

Comments  

 
# WRH2 2013-01-07 03:23
Am I missing something or is Gerry? He calls for a new Scottish democracy. What on earth does he think we want Independence for if not to shape a new democracy? No matter how hard we try, as part of the union we cannot reshape our country. We cannot make our own decisions because we are not in control. Even the meagre powers devolved to Holyrood are there only as long as Westminster allows us to have them. Gerry is putting the cart before the horse. Independence first, then we can create a new democracy.

As for the nonsensical idea of devolving greater powers to councils while presumably removing or severely reducing Holyrood's powers is nothing but a recipe for disaster. It would cause exactly the same gap in government that the relocation of James VI and the nobility to England caused in the 17th century and we all know how well that turned out.
Gerry should first learn the lessons from our own history.
 
 
# Sneddon 2013-01-07 03:35
Gerry the line "Unlike other places, Scotland also seems to have a deep-seated conservatism, lack of curiosity in others, and a profound insularity which sees Scotland as exceptional and unique" I don't recognise this Scotland. Maybe you should change the first line to " The Scottish/british establishment seems to ..." Get what I'm saying. A long winded way to write 'Vote Yes for a better Scotland' And everyother country in the world (including Scotland) IS exceptional and unique so less of the cringe and hand wringing please. I could accept this standard of essay from a 1st year undergraduate but come on. Sweeping generalisions and lack of evidence? You've done better.
 
 
# Christian_Wright 2013-01-07 08:21
Gerry, for goodness sake, take your head out of that dark place wherein the sun don't shine.

Every country in which I've done business around the globe, believes their people and their culture are exceptional.

The attitudes of Scots, their collective pride in their accomplishments , and the wha's-like-us undercurrent in the zeitgeist are evident,in all nation states.

Your faux analysis and practiced angst comprise but one more dropping in a concerted BS effort by the chattering class and Unionists to delegitimize that phenomenon where Scotland is concerned (while promoting the notion shamelessly where "Britain" is concerned).
 
 
# JRTomlin 2013-01-07 08:52
Let me say, Mr. Hassan, as an American that if you can say, "Unlike other places, Scotland also seems to have a deep-seated conservatism, lack of curiosity in others, and a profound insularity which sees Scotland as exceptional and unique." I must conclude that you have not been to the United States. We can beat Scotland on any of those issues.

Now as a frequent visitor to Scotland, I also must add that Scotland IS exceptional and unique. I think it is rather sad that you don't see that. I can assure you that there are few if any Americans who wouldn't say the same about our own nation. I rather suspect that the nations of Ireland, Norway, Finland and Iceland are quite exceptional and unique in their own ways and to their own people. They have NO reason to apologize for that belief.

Neither does Scotland. I must tell you this piece was one of the most arrant and pathetic pieces of "Scottish cringe" I have ever had the misfortune to read.
 
 
# Jo Bloggs 2013-01-07 09:50
I was going to attempt a comment, but everyone has said it for me. Come on Gerry, take off the red rose blinkers, please.
 
 
# UpSpake 2013-01-07 09:55
Gerry. you are in danger of slipping into the bizarre with this. Of all nations. Scots have always had a sense of who they are ever since they were forged into a nation way back.
Travelling and living abroad as I have, I have never shrinked from my Scots roots.
What it totally true however is the Scots cringe no doubt a factor of being always talked down too by our 'superiors' in London.
Let me advise you Gerry that they hold no truck with me, never have and never will.
I hate subservience of any kind and am disgusted when I see it manifest in our policians. We are slowly returning to sanity here with a Referendum promised next year. It's great to be able to say that Gerry - Next Year.
All that remains is to flesh out the arguement for total independence for Scots once again, to raise their heads high.
 
 
# Breeks 2013-01-07 11:09
I had the same thoughts when reading this.

However, what I took to be Mr Hassan talking about somebody else with a philosophy unfamiliar to my own, reads a little better if I consider he might not have been talking about somebody else, so much as talking to somebody else.

I believe Scotland already is moving towards a new democracy, but the Unionists amongst us are the ones kicking and screaming for it not to happen. They are the ones fighting yesterdays arguments with obsolete ideas and who still have faith in the myths they were raised with; that Great Britain is the great provider and the one country which stands a little taller than all the others. Those are the stilted ideas which have no place in a modern Scotland and which need to be challenged.

For myself, the only person I can speak for, I don't think my aspirations for a new and Independent Scotland have ever been any clearer.
 
 
# John Souter 2013-01-07 16:10
Mr Hassan - were you to replace the negativity of "myths and delusions" with hopes and aspirations your article may have substance.

Other than that, do you really consider the supporters for independence envisage a mini or Mark 11 version of Westminster democracy being acceptable?

Because that's what you infer when you reference it to "myth and delusion"; especially so when both artefacts are well honed and used by the Westminster armourers.
 
 
# Mad Jock McMad 2013-01-07 16:52
What I find bizarre is that Gerry is amongst those who wish to do away with the Scottish unicameral tradition in Parliament and replace it with his establishment 'me too' chums in a second chamber to act as a check on our elected politicians 'who can not be trusted'.

He claims to be wishing to upset the 'Scottish establishment players' while promoting the idea these very people he despises should be in a second chamber - the Scottish 'cringe' in action.

I happen to take the view in a country of 6 million folk we are pretty good at sorting out charlatan politicians as McConnel, Gray and now Lamont is finding to their cost. The growth of Labour for Independence is clearly shifting the political landscape when Gerry's pal at the Hootsmon, Mr Barnes, starts spinning this non New Labour, Labour grass roots organisation as being 'SNP run'. The myth and delusion lies elsewhere than with the people of Scotland.
 
 
# mountaincadre 2013-01-07 17:04
If i could just say that we all have roles to play in rebuilding this old nation of ours, there are those like Gerry who make us think and make us talk to each other, we may not agree with what he is saying but is'nt that the point of debating? i know only to well the way westminster uses any chink in our armour to try and cause division but please lets not sacrifice the messenger because we don't like what they say.
For our part that is what we have to do, for you Gerry it's an awful lot harder, i know your a thinker Gerry but this battle needs everybody to nail there colours right to the top of the mast, if you truely believe that we Scots would do a better job runnning our own country then YOU have an obligation to say that loudly and clearly as you are one of those that people do listen to.
 
 
# velofello 2013-01-07 21:29
Unfortunately with NNS's time restriction it isn't possible to respond to this article in detail:
To pick a few:
five things for a new irish republic - security health education equality citizenship. Seems to me that is precisely what the Scottish Government is trying to do.
Me, i certainly didn't go fiscally daft over the economic boom. the Ciry of London surely did?
Halifax Building Society's ( the H of HBOS) lending policies broke the Bank of Scotland, guided by a Mr Hornby.
 
 
# thejourneyman 2013-01-10 00:20
I'm right there with moutaincadre. After reading Gerry's piece and the comments I had to go back to ensure I hadn't missed the point. The referendum is a big step on our journey, Yes or No are but two paths to a different future. A Yes vote is the only road we can take to then radically redesign our new democracy to take back financial power from the banks and government and return it to the people. It won't be easy but it needs to be inclusive and it needs to be a lot different to where we are today!
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments