Banner

lfiBy Allan Grogan, Labour for Independence

In his indelible quest for the approval of Middle England, Labour leader Ed Miliband declared that both old and New Labour have lost relevance, Yet the values of Real Labour are very much at the heart of issues faced north and south of the border and should not be summarily dismissed in the quest for a Disraeli-esque Britain

In his first speech of 2013, our party leader spoke of how New Labour were right to break away from the Labour party of the 80's but failed to stand up to vested interests which allured the party for much of their spell in government.

"New Labour rightly broke from old Labour and celebrated the power of private enterprise to energise our country,

"New Labour, unlike old Labour, pioneered the idea of rights and responsibilities. From crime to welfare to antisocial behaviour, New Labour was clear that we owe duties to each other as citizens."

This speaks of a party desperate of the middle England vote. So sure are Labour that we are in the process of a one-term Government that Ed Miliband has already begun circling the wagons around the issues that matter to the voters he needs.

"I bow to nobody in my celebration of the multi-ethnic, diverse nature of Britain. But high levels of migration were having huge effects on the lives of people in Britain – and too often those in power seemed not to accept this. The fact that they didn't explains partly why people turned against us in the last general election."

The truth is that while this will play to his election market, it doesn't reflect the issues or values of the people of Scotland.

What Mr Miliband propagates is neither a new vision or a return to old politik, rather he seeks a vision of 'Tory lite' a brand of politics which will cut your benefits, will keep you in economic strife but will remember your name along the way.

This kind of sycophantic nonsense appeals to the 24 hour television and 24 second attention span of most who hear the message. The vision of politicians who pat you on the head with one hand while stealing your wallet with the other is surely close at hand.

In truth it does nothing for the people they are supposed to represent. While the Tories laugh while inflicting their mutilation on society we expect the Labour party to fight for those without a voice, yet Liam Byrne is quite shocking in saying...

"Let's face the tough truth – that many people on the doorstep felt that too often we were for shirkers no workers."

This semblance of what is, in name only, a Labour party not only saddens but breaks the heart of anyone who once went to a doorstep for it.

What Mr Miliband and the rest of the current echelon have failed to take note of is, the more they appeal to London and Middle England, the less they appeal to their roots of Northern England and Scotland. It is in these areas we see a demand for Real Labour, a desire to live by a code not based on greed or selfishness, rather one of community and distribution. These codes are much more aligned to the One Nation/Big Society that either of the two may promise.

Yet in this, we see perhaps the biggest obstacle on the left for Scottish independence. Is the suffering of the working man in Glasgow not the same as the working man of Liverpool?

While it is true we share more with our friends in Northern England than the south do, we know that a Real Labour utopia will never come into effect in the U.K. The fact we cannot help our friends in NE does not mean we should not have for ourselves what most in our country seek.

The socialist argument of brotherhood should be muted by the opportunity to have a real social society regardless of national boundaries. We should use independence and the freedom afforded us, to be a shining beacon in a region of cuts, despair and bad economic policy.

Many people, on many sites have claimed that Labour cannot win a U.K. election without Scotland, this is why the H.Q. are part of the Better Together campaign. This is of course wrong, Labour could win the next election without Scotland, it will probably have to, the truth is that the current Labour party of the U.K. no longer reflects the people of Scotland. Yes vote or not the current track of jump right and ask questions later will not sit long with a country too smart to be fooled by tory sheep in red wool.

Desraelis vision of a one nation Britain, no longer reflects the differences between the stretches of this Isle. This was obvious by the welfare vote which passed 324-268 in Westminster, yet the Scottish vote read 46-11 against.

Surely it is clear that we no longer are held by the ties of the empire but rather, what is best for the people around us.

The current Scottish Labour Party and The Labour Party no longer reflect the ideals, needs and wants of the Scottish people, yet this does not mean that the Labour message is not important or wanted in the country.

We have already seen through our early stages of our community campaigning, that there is a desire for a strong, real, Labour party within Scotland. A party which promotes the benefits of this nation, who stands in defence of it, who would never claim that we are too small, too daft, too stupid to have our own nation.

We as Scots have such a negative opinion of ourselves, yet it is worth remembering Churchill's words when he said;

"Of all the small nations on earth, perhaps only the ancient Greeks surpass the Scots in their contribution to mankind."

We as a nation, can make it on our own, we can survive, and thrive as an independent state.

The visions of a Labour party once been, is why many in Scotland still vote Labour, myself included. But we need a Labour party which represents us and the ideals of a Real Labour.

The decision to fight against your own party is a lot like the decision on the referendum. We know the best way forward, we know what must be done, yet some stall at the final gate.

Real Labour can only be returned in an independent Scotland, free from the tyranny of the Tories, free from the shackles of New Labour and free from a Westminster bastardisation of Keir Hardie's dream.

Walk through the gates, into the life you dreamed your world could be.

Please think differently, think Labour for Independence.

Comments  

 
# pmcrek 2013-01-12 18:10
Quote:
Yet in this, we see perhaps the biggest obstacle on the left for Scottish independence. Is the suffering of the working man in Glasgow not the same as the working man of Liverpool?


This argument has always confused me, currently the plight of the working classes across the globe have been made considerably worse by the 300+ year existence of the British State. Reason enough surely for the working classes of Glasgow and Liverpool to celebrate its demise.

Far from being the revolutionary vanguard of the proletariat that some would have us believe, the British state has done more to oppose social justice on a global scale than almost any other state to have ever existed. Meanwhile joined together in our unitary state as we are today anyway, conditions for the working classes of Glasgow and Liverpool only get worse.
 
 
# .Scot 2013-01-12 19:01
How can I praise this piece high enough? As an ex-Labour Party activist/devotee, this Labour Party never shared my goals, ideals or aspirations. Nor has it in truth, ever shared the political and social ambitions of it's members. I was elected to attend Scottish conferences as a very young man where I witnessed a camraderie and kinship with my fellow delegates who each year voted unanimously to end the atrocity of Nuclear arms race and a shared desire to live in a Scotland that was free from Tory rule, free of Tory economic greed and free of Tory Dickensian madness.

Was it the invention of the Internet that pulled away the veil of deceit, when we realised that our stated Socialist intentions were never shared by a duplicitous Tory leadership at the heart of Labour which thrived only on cronyism, illusion and patronages at the expense of the masses?

Sorry but my mantra is now & forever "Labour-no-more"!
 
 
# Sunshine on Crieff 2013-01-12 19:24
Quote:
Yet in this, we see perhaps the biggest obstacle on the left for Scottish independence. Is the suffering of the working man in Glasgow not the same as the working man of Liverpool?


I've come across this question, and the issue does, of course, have relevance to anyone on the left. The response I would give is that I am also concerned about the suffering of the working man (and woman!) in Lyon, Marseille and Toulouse. That doesn't mean that I want all of Scotland's tax revenues paid to Paris and have all major decisions affecting my country made by the French government.
 
 
# Sleekit 2013-01-13 03:47
I wrestled with this question a while back and this is what I came up with...

wingsland.podgamer.com/.../
 
 
# Saltire Groppenslosh 2013-01-12 21:03
Dear Allan,

In the recent past I've berated you for not setting up an independent Labour Party and can only hope that you are right and I am wrong. Apologies for that.

The only contentious part of your article is the part about Liverpool which you answer well but is perhaps not clear enough.

Question : Would we as socialists hold ourselves back from achieving the society we have campaigned for and dreamt of if it couldn't also help those in Northern England?

Answer : Independence will help those in the North of England because if predictions are right, there will be a major re-balancing of the economy from South to North and it is those in the Northern part of England that will bathe in the glow of a successful Scotland.

Kindest regards,
David Milligan
 
 
# Macart 2013-01-12 23:24
Good tae see ye SG. Y'know this lad may be goin' places. Hopefully those who are still real Labour at heart will take note and see the opportunity to have their cake and eat it. That is have a fully independent Labour party in an independent Scotland.
 
 
# topherdawson 2013-01-12 23:54
Good for you Alan, I'm glad to hear someone sticking up for Labour's original humanitarian principles. An independent Scotland needs a Labour party with a soul, either as a decent articulate opposition or as a party of government, if the voters decide so.
Currently Labour are strangled and gagged by the need to appeal to the voters in South East England. I look forward to the day Scottish labour can really speak for ordinary Scots. But there is a lot of dirty linen to be washed first from the rotten boroughs of West Central Scotland where Labour have ruled unchallenged for nearly 100 years.
 
 
# Barontorc 2013-01-13 01:09
What's stopping them registering the 'Scottish Labour Party' for the 2015 GE? There is no official Labour Party registered in Scotland, only the 'Labour Party in Scotland' which is registered at its HQ in London and treated as a UK regional party operation.

Show the Wastemonster mob the door as far as Scotland is concerned and give Labour supporters the party they want in an independent Scotland at the 2016 Scottish election.
 
 
# Early Ball 2013-01-13 02:41
I would doubt Allan would want to do that.
If they did that chances are there would be a "militant tendency" type expulsion.

If they fight within the Labour party and try to get more support.
 
 
# Jim Johnston 2013-01-13 11:38
I'm all for any party who has Scotland at it's heart, whatever it's political ideology. But remember, the poor are everywhere on earth, not just in these islands.

In a democracy people can vote for any system or ideology they want, in any election.

Voting Yes for Scotland in the referendum which is not an election, goes far beyond any ideology or meaningless religious persuasion.

Robert Burns wrote of Scotlands place in, and views on, humanity. No other Scot living or dead comes even close to being such an ambassador for his homeland. From my reading of Burns works, he was never particularly blinded by any dogmatic ideology. He was well capable of seeing and understanding every human condition.
 
 
# bringiton 2013-01-13 22:46
Until a few months ago,I was of the opinion that Labour had one message for Middle England and another for Scotland which were in direct conflict.
However,when the Scottish leader announced the end of all Scottish policies,I assumed that we were indeed dealing with a "one nation" party.
Now,it seems that london Labour are saying maybe,perhaps,p ossibly,univers al benefits are a good idea,so either Ms Lamont is going to have to do a U-turn on recently announced policy or we will return to the conflicting message syndrome from Labour.
I hope that the LFI movement are successful in getting across to Labour supporters that the only way to get consistent policies is to ditch London Labour.
The current "leadership" in Scotland could then stand on their Tory platform of welfare reform which they could put to the electorate.
Somehow,I don't see that happening...it is all smoke and mirrors with the unionist Labour party in Scotland at present.
 
 
# Keef 2013-01-13 23:55
Congrats to you Allan.

Someone mentioned that you should register 'the Scottish labour party' for the next election. I think you'll find it has already been done and that party is now defunct.

I know you feel it is better to fight this 'London takeover' from within. The sad fact is no one has clue what the Scottish arm of the labour movement stands for anymore.

I venture Keir Hardie would be just as raging as you if he were alive to see this 'sellout' of core labour principles.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments