Banner

By Campbell Martin

Those of us getting on a bit in years will recall a time when British governments strove to achieve full-employment.

The idea of creating work for the people was pursued by both Labour and Tory administrations following the Second World War.

There was sound reasoning behind the strategy: the more people in work, the more tax revenues accrued to the Treasury and the lower government-spend on welfare.

Socially, full employment meant people knew the dignity of work. Parents were able to support their families. Children saw positive role-models in the immediate family. Taxes were re-invested in local communities through the building of social housing, healthcare facilities, libraries, sports pitches and leisure complexes.

With full employment, children grew up with hope and opportunity. Everyone had the prospect of securing work, earning a living and playing a positive role in society. However, the ‘post-war consensus’ on full-employment was shattered in 1979 with the election of a Tory Government led by Margaret Thatcher.

Expendable

In recent years a number of right-wing, revisionist writers have tried to portray Thatcher as a visionary who pulled the country up by its boot-straps, taking-on and defeating trade unions that, in Thatcher’s opinion, had been hellbent on crippling industry (apparently in some plot orchestrated in the Soviet Union).

The reality was very different. Margaret Thatcher and her Tory Government advanced the twin ideas of global capitalism and the unfettered free-market.

To Thatcher, there was no such thing as society, people were expendable: all that mattered was allowing a small Tory-voting elite to make as much money as possible.

Taxes on the rich were slashed, publicly-owned utilities - gas, electricity, telecoms, transport - were sold-off to private investors looking for a quick profit, and supposedly uneconomic heavy industries were closed. The economic and social devastation we are currently enduring was started in the 1980s by the Tory Government of Margaret Thatcher.

The policies of Thatcher closed viable coal mines, steel manufacturing plants, textile factories and shipbuilding yards, with millions of workers thrown onto the scrapheap. Industrial action taken in attempts to save workplaces that often provided employment for entire communities were ruthlessly smashed by draconian anti-tradeunion laws.

When greedy bosses closed factories in Britain, shipping work to low-wage, sweat-shop economies in developing countries, a compliant right-wing media portrayed this as ‘good news’ about British companies expanding overseas.

Thirty-years of unfettered freemarket capitalism, where the profits of multi-national corporations have been put before the interests of the people, has created today’s reality of soaring unemployment, increasing levels of poverty and deprivation, and a generation of young people robbed of hope and opportunity. Yet, according to the British Unionist partners of Tory, Labour and Liberal Democrat, this is as good as it gets for Scotland.

Different approach

The Better Together campaign tells us we should reject independence and, instead, we should simply allow Westminster-based Tory Governments to continue destroying Scottish industries, Scottish jobs, Scottish hopes, Scottish aspirations and Scottish lives.

With independence we can embrace a very different approach to running our own country.

With socialist policies in an independent Scotland we can once again invest in creating jobs: a shipbuilding industry that doesn’t have to rely on making warships; aircraft manufacturing could be revived, bringing with it the broad spectrum of well-paid, high skilled jobs; a free public transport system would require buses, trains, ships made in Scotland; engineering projects - railways, roads, bridges, buildings; the construction of social housing, to name just a few employment sectors that could once again thrive, providing employment for university graduates, skilled tradespeople, unskilled workers and apprentices.

In an independent, socialist Scotland we can put the interests of Scots before the profits of multinational corporations and venture capitalists. In an independent, socialist Scotland we can once again deliver a society that provides the dignity of work for all of our citizens, and restores hope and opportunity to all of our young people.

Courtesy of the Scottish Socialist Voice http://www.scottishsocialistvoice.net/

Comments  

 
# jurist 2013-03-18 03:36
A socialist Scotland? No thanks. Socialism has caused poverty in every country that has had any kind of dalliance with it.

High taxes, large public debt; that's the last thing Scotland needs.
 
 
# ampocarbuile 2013-03-18 07:30
Quoting jurist:
A socialist Scotland? No thanks. Socialism has caused poverty in every country that has had any kind of dalliance with it.

High taxes, large public debt; that's the last thing Scotland needs.


So the social democratic model followed by the Scandinavian countries has impoverished them? Mindless baloney.

The neo-con policies of the right that were imposed by the US - they actually did impoverish countries all across Latin America. Look at Argentina, that byword for fiscal stability.

Before you bloviate again,read some history, please.
 
 
# setondene 2013-03-18 16:50
Scandinavian states are not socialist. Name one that is.
 
 
# Jo Bloggs 2013-03-18 19:08
setondene

I think what ampocarbuile is referring to is the mixed economies we have here in Fenno-Scandinavia, which are essentially market economies tempered by a quasisocialist concern for people, such an unfashionable concern among Thatcher's bastard children.

Unfortunately many of the things Scotland has suffered from under and since Thatcher are now creeping into Finnish society/politics, though less so, I believe, in Scandinavia per se (Sweden, Denmark and Norway, to say nothing of Iceland, which provides a shining example of how to deal with corrupt bankers and craven politicians).

No, the Scandivian countries are not socialist, but they are largely social democratic.
 
 
# jurist 2013-03-19 00:33
Amporcarbuile,
The only alternative to not wanting socialism is the extreme right as evidenced by Argentina?? Don't be so stupid.

Mixed economies are not socialist. Maybe you should read some economics.
 
 
# manxbhoy 2013-03-19 20:05
[quote name="jurist"]Amporcarbuile,
The only alternative to not wanting socialism is the extreme right as evidenced by Argentina?? Don't be so stupid.

Mixed economies are not socialist. Maybe you should read some economics.[/quote

jurist, time you went back to school, your statement highlighted above is wrong. As any secondary pupil could tell you, the concept of mixed economies are fundementaly based on the governence of social democratic or democratic socialist party,
and as everyone here seems to be blaming that woman for the demise of full employment and the rise of monetarism, maybe a look at the part played by denis healey in 1975 in his surrender to the imf could help remind people that just as labour first introduced the bedroom tax (2008), work program, Atos and welfare abolition, so they introduced monetarism in that fateful year of 1975 rendering mass unemployment a reality.
 
 
# jurist 2013-03-19 23:19
mabxnhoy,
I think you should take your own advice about going back to school; with me its university (more than once). Socialism pre-dates notions of mixed economies and , you might be interested to know pre-dated Marx. The concept of the mixed economy is not synonymous with socialism. Any real socialist would tell you, mixed economies are, at best/worst, a very watered down version of socialism.

Industries were brought into state ownership in Britain for a number of reasons. The main one being that they were viewed as strategic. The Tories nationalised some large companies - was that because they were socialist? If you want socialism; the state ownership of a few industries isn't socialism.

BTW. I'm not an apologist for Thatcher or any Tory. I don't want your politics either - seems to be based on ignorance.

The remainder of your post is irrelevant to my post.
 
 
# Davy 2013-03-18 18:42
While I dont agree with everything you have written, I have to say your description of what Thatcher and her tory government did to this country and their reasons for it is very accurate.

Having lived through that time I very much remember the sense of utter hopelessness there was throughout Scotland during that troubled times.

There was nothing any Scottish MP could do about it, and the tories took full advantage to rip Scotland apart.

So if you want a reason to vote yes just speak to someone who had to live through that times in Scotland.


VOTE YES, VOTE SCOTLAND.
 
 
# art1001 2013-03-19 23:56
Actually that was not true.

They,'Scottish' Labour, could have crossed the floor and joined the SNP at any time and forced a constitutional crisis. Even a threat of doing so could have stopped Thatcher in her tracks.

They chose instead to betray the Scottish people and behave like compliant sheep. Hence their being subsequently named the Feeble Fifty. Party and power at Westminster came before the well-being of Scotland then and now.
 
 
# UpSpake 2013-03-19 15:01
Davy. They are still doing it. Watch for a reaffirmation of the same tomorrow. Osborne won't touch his Bullingdon friends from school who inhabit the very core of the establishment.
It's remarkable just how silent the Scots are to the state of our country pre referendum day.
I doubt if an independent Scotland would repair tha damage but the deeper this mire gets before Indy, the longer it will take to get back to core Scots values, if many of remember what they were by then ?.
 
 
# Ian Brotherhood 2013-03-19 17:57
SSP Public Meeting on Bedroom Tax, tonight, Fullarton Community Centre, Ayr Rd, Irvine (beside the high flats) - speaker Richie Venton. 7.30.
All welcome.
Stop worrying in silence about this wretched tax - help us to do something about it and give THEM something to worry about!
 
 
# Fungus 2013-03-19 23:08
Ian, the only thing we can do about this obscenity and it's attack on the poor, the disabled and the disadvantaged is to vote Yes next autumn and get this country back to a proper socially democratic government.
 
 
# robbo 2013-03-20 12:54
Whilst Thatcher's term was devastating for many and the transition could have been handled more gracefully... and something like the poll tax were just stupid. The blame has to fall at the feet of the inefficient industries that had been propped up for years by previous governments.

Had these industries been subjected to market forces all along, there would have never been the sudden collapse of industries which devastated communities in one go, the transition would have been a lot more gradual and other businesses would have taken their place.

There is no doubt that Thatcher was good for the UK at a macro level. However the medium term costs to certain communities was devastating and that is why she is such a polarised figure.

Whatever you think of her, she said what she thought and did what she believed in, which is a rare thing amongst politicians these days who will say absolutely anything to win votes.
 
 
# Triangular Ears 2013-03-21 11:41
It doesn't really matter what Thatcher did or didn't do, because in reality it was London government that destroyed regional industrial power centres like Glasgow's shipbuilding and Sheffield's steel.

London resented these cities and their industrial independence from The City and nationalised their industry in order to get control, and ownership, of them. That Labour nationalised and Tories shut down is just two acts of the same play.

If Glasgow had been a famous banking centre and London a shipbuilding centre, then banking would be non-existent today and shipbuilding would be flourishing.

The decline of Britain as an industrial power is to do with centralisation of power in London, not the colour of government.

The proof is this is the fact that the City of London exists at all today, having bankrupted not only itself, but the entire country. Not even "inefficient subsidy junkie" heavy industry managed that.
 
 
# robbo 2013-03-21 18:35
it was London government that destroyed regional industrial power centres like Glasgow's shipbuilding and Sheffield's steel.

London resented these cities and their industrial independence from The City and nationalised their industry in order to get control, and ownership, of them.


Edinburgh and Glasgow are the 2nd and 3rd financial centres of the UK so i don't buy that.

Trade balance was fine under the Tories, yes industry declined but it was replaced with services, it was only when Labour came in and Brown practised his reckless monetary policy that the balance of trade took a large dip south.

Look at this graph. The correlations is utterly staggering and leaves no doubt that Labour absolutely destroyed the UK for decades to come.

guidance-research.org/.../...
 
 
# Triangular Ears 2013-03-22 11:02
I'm not sure what your graph shows (it's missing labels/legend) other than it all started to go wrong in the 80s when the Tories were in power. There's a massive dip starting in the early to mid 80s and troughing in the late 80s.

Sure, there is a massive correlation to when Labour came in in 1997 but it was hardly all fine during Thatcher's 80s, which rather backs up my point.
 
 
# robbo 2013-03-22 14:48
It's the trade balance. The black line is important not the blue.

The difference between the Thatcher years and Labour is that during the former the dip was temporary due to the general transition in the UK economy's structure - the intention was to make the composition of the UK's economy be determined by the market and not politicians - which is valid.

Brown actively created an unsustainable bubble by manipulating Stirling. This gave the UK a false sense of wealth which in turn destroyed the balance of trade. This was allowed to fester for years until it burst resulting in the shocking state of affairs we are now in. Unfortunately the current Chancellor is pussy footing around his own ideology and not really achieving anything other than making himself very unpopular - which is in turn giving credence to adopting the very same flawed economic theories that got us into this mess in the first place and obviously won't get us out.
 
 
# art1001 2013-03-21 10:50
I think when food banks are opening all over Scotland in an oil rich country it must be the last straw for many on the left.

We all need a revolution - north and south of the border. That revolution will/must/can only begin in Scotland. Its the ONLY way that ordinary people can fight back and reclaim their rights and dignity.

The penny is finally beginning to drop. Vote YES in 2014.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments