Banner

 

Drinks firm Whyte & Mackay has been forced to apologise after it emerged that figures it released attacking minimum pricing for alcohol were UK figures and not as had widely been believed Scottish figures.

 

The company had claimed that the introduction of minimum pricing by the Scottish government could lead to Whyte & Mackay having to cut 300 jobs.  It also emerged that the firm had used a price per unit figure of 50p; 25% higher than the example figure of 40p cited by the SNP.

 

The Leading whisky supplier has said it is sorry if it misled anyone over the case it made against the SNP's minimum drink pricing.  The companies claims were widely reported in the main stream Scottish media with The Scotsman, The Record and The BBC each featuring prominent articles containing the companies criticisms of the SNP policy.

 

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said:

"I think Whyte & Mackay have been rather disingenuous with this evidence - it's based on a 50 pence per unit minimum price across the whole of the UK and clearly our proposals apply only to Scotland.

 

"The Whyte & Mackay document looks at a 50p per unit minimum price of alcohol, when at every stage the Scottish government have illustrated the positive impact of minimum pricing on the basis of 40p, which would result in a minimum price for a bottle of whisky of £11.20 - not £14 - and well below the existing price of the vast majority of whisky products."

 

Company spokesman Rob Bruce insisted there had been no intention of "pulling the wool over anybody's eyes".

 

Mr Bruce added: "Certainly from the point of view of communicating the job numbers, we certainly didn't set out to mislead anybody - if that is the case I can only apologise."

 

The Scottish government said a minimum-pricing policy - which has been backed by all four UK Chief Medical Officers, other health experts and the police and licensed trade - would contribute to reducing alcohol consumption in Scotland and help save lives.

 

The Alcohol Bill also includes proposals to ban drink promotions, grant powers for licensing boards to raise the age limit for buying alcohol from 18 to 21 and a 'social responsibility charge' for retailers who sell alcohol.

 

Minimum pricing has been backed by Tennent's, one of Scotland's biggest alcohol brands.  It has also been backed by the NSPCC’s ChildLine service in Scotland who has submitted a joint statement with seven other organisations: Children 1st; Aberlour; YouthLink Scotland; Barnardo’s Scotland; Action for Children Scotland; Quarriers; and Parenting across Scotland.

 

 

Comments  

 
# Coigach 2010-03-13 12:29
Was this a piece of genuine incompetence?

Or was it an example of Indian-style press relations?

How much does the standard of accuracy in the press release in question relate to the fact that though Whyte & Mackay may produce whisky in Scotland, they are in fact 100% Indian-owned? Does the press release originate in a department run along the lines of an Indian call centre?
 
 
# Gaavster 2010-03-14 16:16
I noticed this little tiddler lurking on Jackie Baillie's list of members interests here (scottish.parliament.uk/.../...)

"On 11 July 2009 I received two tickets for the Scottish Open at Loch Lomond Golf Club and hospitality from Chivas Brothers. The approximate value of this gift is £400. [Registered 12 July 2009]"

Just wondering if this could help explain some of the opposition to the minimum pricing bill....
 
 
# Traquir 2010-03-14 16:33
Excellent catch and one 'missed' by the Mainstream Scottish Press who were only to happy to headline the initial story. They appear incapable of any honesty in retracting or even providing equally prominent headlines when one of their stories is exposed yet again as largely baseless. Media sources like Newsnet are invaluable in helping to expose the truth behind the report stories in the MSM. Must say though I am still somewhat stunned at the Scotsman recently having grown a spine and balls with their exposing attacks on the drug fueled, mafia linked Glasgow pig troughers. Either this was too overt for even a staunch Brit Nat controlled paper to ignore and/or economic reality has sunk in that reality based reporting, rather than being a 'Scottish' Labour press release automaton, will help to stem the red ink on their bottom line. Either way it is good to see the faux-socialists exposed as little more than a herd of corrupt neds.
 
 
# Somerled 2010-03-17 14:05
I think the health committee are getting themselves all worked up about a storm in a whisky glass.As it is the intention to reduce the demand for alcohol it is inevitable that there will be job losses in the production of alcohol. The exact numbers will not be known until some time later.
What they should be doing is placing much more focus on stopping shopkeepers selling drink to children and adults who are known to be buying drink for children. When was the last time a shopkeeper lost his licence for selling drink to underagers ?
Stop trying to use Whyte & Mackay as the bad guys in all this.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments