By G.A.Ponsonby 
Unionist politicians and their allies in the media have today mounted a concerted campaign against First Minister Alex Salmond following a row over the BBC’s refusal to allow the SNP leader to appear on a rugby programme.
The attacks on Mr Salmond are based on comments he made where he compared the BBC’s London based political adviser Ric Bailey to a ‘Gauleiter’, a term used to describe someone who behaves in a petty and authoritarian manner.
Mr Bailey had blocked a scheduled non-political interview with Mr Salmond that was to have been broadcast hours before the rugby international between Scotland and England. The London based political adviser overturned an earlier agreement, citing what he described as “heightened tensions” over Scotland’s independence referendum.
The BBC then found itself on the back foot with a furious First Minister slamming the decision and claiming Mr Bailey had “panicked”. The First Minister suggested that the BBC were taking guidance from Downing Street and described the situation as something that would be found in a “tin-pot dictatorship”.
However this morning several newspapers, including the Daily Record, the Scotsman and the Herald and many from south of the border were claiming that, by using the term ‘Gauleiter’ Mr Salmond had in fact compared Mr Bailey to a Nazi.
The basis for the claims lie in the origins of the word which refer to a low ranking regional official in German in the 1920’s and 30’s – a period when the nation was under Nazi control. However the term is now a recognised euphemism for someone who acts in a petty and officious manner and has long since ceased to refer to the era of 1930’s Germany.
Supporters of Mr Salmond have pointed out that only six days ago Telegraph journalist Jeremy Warner himself used the phrase several times in an article on the Greek debt crisis.
In the article entitled ‘Germany has every right to impose a gauleiter on Greece’ Mr Warner wrote: “I'm sorry, but I cannot agree with the general sense of outrage sparked by calls for an EU bureaucrat – or German gauleiter, as depicted in some quarters – to take control of the Greek economy.”
He adds: “What's more, if the austerity continues to cause the economy to contract, the debt burden will just keep on growing, regardless of efforts to cut the deficit or even because of them. It's a vicious circle. So even the lash of the German gauleiter won't correct the problem.”
Mr Warner’s article will prove embarrassing to his colleague and well known Salmond critic and BBC Scotland regular Alan Cochrane who, in attacking Mr Salmond for using the same phrase, wrote: “We could be generous and suggest that calling the hapless BBC mandarin a "Gauleiter" displays either an imperfect knowledge of the English language or of 20th century history – or both.
But knowing our Dear Leader as we know, it is entirely possible that he thinks it is perfectly all right for him to liken those who dare to defy him as some kind of Nazi.”
The Scotsman newspaper itself is also facing accusations of rank hypocrisy after it emerged that one of their own journalists had used the term to describe Labour MSP Duncan McNeil.
Six years ago a paragraph of an article read: “We have taken this principled - if unusual - stance because we have been offered only limited rights of access by that Gauleiter of Holyrood's catering facilities, Labour MSP Duncan McNeil.”
Unionist politicians have seized on the misrepresentation with Labour's Patricia Ferguson saying: "What is totally unacceptable, however, is for the First Minister to accuse journalists of occupying the post of a Nazi district leader. That is an ugly smear."
The Scottish Conservatives also joined Labour with former BBC presenter and new Tory leader Ruth Davidson claiming her former employer had merely stood up to Mr Salmond's bullying, saying: "There is now a disturbing pattern of behaviour emerging from the SNP against anyone who dares to stand up to them.
“It is a completely inappropriate outburst from a man supposed to be running Scotland, and symptomatic of the SNP’s ‘attack mode’ where they try to destroy anyone with whom they disagree.”
The well orchestrated smear campaign will do little to dampen the mounting cynicism in what many are increasingly viewing as a Unionist dominated media in Scotland. Newspaper sales have plummeted at a higher rate than those south of the border as readers tire of a lack of penetrating and objective analysis and apparent news manipulation.
The row over the BBC’s role in reporting Scottish politics is also threatening to escalate with news that the Scottish Government plan to present concerns to Chair of the BBC Trust Chris Patten. Included in a list of issues is the behaviour of several BBC reporters over their use of Unionist coined phrases when presenting news and current affairs items.
There are growing concerns amongst many viewers of the role of the broadcaster, in particular the continued use of Unionist leaning pundits and the frequent top-loading of debates where Unionists are allowed more participants than their Nationalist rivals.
The behaviour of the BBC in Scotland is has also led to campaigns from viewers angry at the axing of high quality political and cultural Scottish programmes, including music programme ‘Introducing In’ and the popular ‘Janice Forsyth Show’ as well as Newsweek Scotland.
Last week former BBC Governor Jeremy Peat acknowledged that the BBC needed to improve its coverage of Scottish news.
Somebody left a cryptic quote or something to that effect that the BBC would be getting their comeuppance very soon. Does anybody know what this was or was I just imagining it?
Perhaps if Alan Cochrane's own command of the English language was as good as he seems to think it is, he'd have known that the term "gauleiter" is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as a general term for a bully or a petty official with dictatorial tendencies. The Oxford English dictionary also notes that gauleiter has been used in this sense since 1943. So it's been established in English as a term for a bully for almost 70 years.
Although I have accepted the dinner invite, I am somewhat constrained in accepting the one to the pre-prandial cocktails. The reason is that the Scottish Parliamentary Journalists’ Association, of which I have the honour to be a member, is boycotting the said watering hole. We have taken this principled – if unusual – stance because we have been offered only limited rights of access by that Gauleiter of Holyrood’s catering facilities, Labour MSP Duncan McNeil.”
(Alan Cochrane, Scotland On Sunday, 22 January 2006*)
This rank hypocricy may not be read about or heard of on the BBC. Rest assured though, it will still be felt through the populace by people like your good selves writing and talking about it. the fact that it is so blatant will only serve to bolster the will of the people. No need to get hysterical or down hearted, let them continue to feed the fire. The time has come to well and truly forget about ever hearing a positive case for the union as we know now for sure, there is none.
These lies and smears are coming from a very shaken opposition. They know the battle is all but lost and have become complacent in their hysteria, Their actions may well get worse, for they know the Independence camp is moving ever closer to the prize. There is no higher religion than truth.It is so much easier to win the argument when you know what you are saying is the truth. Lies, however, will sooner or later be outed.
Yes to Independence. Yes to truth. Yes to a better future. Yes to being rid of this corrupt horde of vermin in ermine. Yes to a new Scottish enlightenment. Yes to Scotland flourishing. Yes to an egalitairian society. Yes to free Uni education. Yes to a strong NHS. Yes to free prescriptions. Yes to a nuclear free Scotland. Yes to controlling or own destiny. Yes to being "that Nation again".
Having decided long ago that independence was the only way to go it gets more and more enjoyable each day watching the Unionists twisting and turning to try and attack the SNP. The fake outrage and indignation it's all crepes, they can try every smear and scare tactic they like but nothing will ever convince me that staying in the union will help Scotland.
Many of those who doubt if we can go it alone may be persuaded if they really feel that those who support Independence send out the vibe that we have total belief and confidence in Scotland and her people.
Unionists manipulate Salmond remarks in attempt at diverting attention from BBC Censorship scandal
I dont think that complaining to chris patten will do any good...
I dont think that complaining to chris patten will do any good, as he is an ex tory minister and will say the ebc has done nothing wrong.We will need to take our case to europe somehow and see if they can help us.
I've never watched newsweek scotland. care to fill me in? any good? and do u think we cud protest bout their bias at the same time? altho I guess slashing our voice in the news is considered bias. may be up for it
BBC Scotland business blogs - closed again for comment.
bbc.co.uk/.../...
Story on credit agencies.
The SNP have the ultimate sanction, refuse to put up a representative at any of the forthcoming (eventually) debates on the BBC. Make it clear it is because of the beeb's bias. All the meaningful debates will then be held on non BBC channels and the corporation will be reduced to reporting them, or not.
Ready to Start 2012-02-07 09:07
“I know several friends who have submitted letters on the BBCs ban commenting on the fact that BBC will not apply this ban to others or have an equal playing field for the SNP on "National" TV..................
needless to say none were published by the Herald or by the Scotsman which printed two letters critical of Alex Salmond.”
I have resisted the urge to comment on the hysterical BBC bashing on this site, until now.
I am sick and tired of the hypocrisy permeating the treads of NNS. Posters safe in the knowledge that their anonymity will protect them, safe in the knowledge that they will not have to justify their remarks.
Ready to Start 2012-02-07 09:07
“I know several friends who have submitted letters on the BBCs ban commenting on the fact that BBC will not apply this ban to others or have an equal playing field for the SNP on "National" TV..................
needless to say none were published by the Herald or by the Scotsman which printed two letters critical of Alex Salmond.”
I have resisted the urge to comment on the hysterical BBC bashing on this site, until now.
I am sick and tired of the hypocrisy permeating the threads of NNS. Posters safe, in the knowledge that their anonymity will protect them, safe in the knowledge that they will not have to justify their remarks.
manxbhoy 2012-02-07 11:31
“Hello Exel, i am truly genuinly sorry you feel this way as i find your quirky contributions on here to be quite funny, usually...till now.
I would personally take this opportunity to rebuke you for your last highlighted sentence.”
Hello yourself: I accept your opinion of my contributions, but not your right to rebuke me for making them.
To my knowledge I have never responded to one of your comments and I have no knowledge of you personally. Your reasons for anonymity may be justified but personal.
Absolutely nothing to do with, expressing an opinion on a public forum anonymously, in my opinion.
Your “Secondly for your information and as your orange book scots leader will affirm” is far too cryptic for me.
AlJazeera do not appear to hold the BBC in the high regard they(BBC) would have us believe
For example, if the Scottish Parliament takes responsibility for the country's public institutions, then the country will have its own broadcaster - a Scottish Broadcasting Company. And the Scots probably won't to create a scale model of the British original. After all, the BBC has a pretty poor record on investigative reporting. While it is proud of its investigation into alleged corruption at FIFA, it dropped the ball on Iraq, the financial crisis, the MPs' expenses scandal and the criminal conspiracies at News International. The BBC is great at costume drama and nature documentaries. As a check on power it leaves something to be desired.
'A progressive beacon'