Banner

By Dave Taylor

The latest Panelbase poll still has the SNP riding high on 45% in constituencies (44% on the regional list); Labour are 33% (31%); Conservatives 13% (12%); Lib-Dems 5% (5%); Greens are at 6% on the regional list.

According to the “Scotland Votes” calculator, that would mean SNP losing 4 constituencies and 3 list seats; Labour gaining 4 plus 1; Conservatives losing 1 list seat; Lib-Dems unchanged; Greens gaining 3 list seats - resulting in pro-independence parties having an 8 seat majority over the Better Together coalition.

However, before anyone gets excited or depressed by these numbers, remember the usual caveats.

Polls of this size have a margin of error of 3%, so the actual election might result in the SNP exceeding their landslide performance of 2011, or falling back to 2007 levels (but still the largest party).

There’s the little matter of the 2014 referendum to come before these elections.  Whatever the result of that, it is likely to be a game changer in Scottish politics.

On the independence question, 34% would vote Yes (down 3% since October), 47% would vote No (+2%), with 19% undecided (+2%).

It’s worth putting this poll into its political context.

Since the Edinburgh Agreement in October, the No campaign and its allies have mounted a sustained attack on the SNP, and specifically on its Leader and Deputy Leader.  Yet support for the various parties has hardly shifted, and the reported change in opinion on independence is within the range of sampling error.

A vigorous campaign which shows no positive results can only be deemed a failure.

Usefully, however, the poll gives some detail on issues which can dissuade Scots from voting Yes next year.

40% thought an independent Scotland would be financially worse off than the rest of the UK, while 37% disagreed, and 23% didn’t know.

46% thought the “North Sea oil revenues are running out”, while 37% disagreed, and 17% didn’t know.  Without access to the detail of the questions, it’s difficult to know what this means, if anything. Of course, they are running out – but over what period of time?

The way a question is asked can influence the answer – as the polling gurus were keen for us to know about the proposed referendum question!

49% thought independence would cost Scotland many defence jobs, while 24% disagreed, and 27% didn’t know.  40% thought an independent Scotland would have little say over interest rates and public spending in a sterling zone, while 26% disagreed, and 34% didn’t know.

It would be interesting to know how many thought that a dependent Scotland had any say in the current sterling zone. However, alert readers will know that, even if most pollsters themselves act professionally, the questions are selected by their clients for their own purposes.

In this case the clients were the Sunday Times and Real Radio Scotland, make of that what you will.

Comments  

 
# Marian 2013-01-28 20:43
Whilst there has been little change in voting intentions by the hard core of independence supporters it would appear on the face of it that the unionists disinformation campaign is getting results judging by the responses given to what can only be described as loaded questions.

However we haven't yet had sight of the Scottish Government's White Paper on independence and the actual campaign won't start until 4 months before referendum day during which time we trust there will be draconian rules with severe penalties set by Holyrood applied to the conduct of the campaign to ensure fairness and honesty by all and especially by all the TV channels seen in Scotland and all the newspapers which are sold in Scotland.

Only once we get a level playing field will the job of communicating the obvious benefits of independence to the people of Scotland overthrow the present unionist inspired negativity and enable the YES vote to win the referendum.
 
 
# bringiton 2013-01-28 21:10
It amazes me that people in Scotland still think that Labour are going to look after their interests.
Labour take care of themselves,fami ly and friends first and anything else is a long way down the list of priorities (straight out of the Tory handbook).
This is very fine if you fall into any of the above categories but if not then a completely wasted vote.
One of the major aspects of independence,as far as I am concerned, will be the rebirth of political parties in Scotland which will truly represent their constituencies and not party or self interest.
 
 
# redcliffe62 2013-01-29 06:24
Of course when people watch the beeb and nothing else they will believe what they are told.
Imagine if the beeb said, figures prove Scotland subsidises England, oil will last 100 years and if independent Scotland would be far richer than England and most other countries in Europe.They will not.

Questions you will not see.

Will Scottish defence jobs cover the 650 job losses from removing the nuclear subs?

Would Scotland be the 6th richest country in the world if all the oil revenues were to go to Scotland?

How much does Scotland really subsidise the UK? An investigative report...

Instead of this they get the drivel about EU uncertainty and editorialised opinionating against dignitataries as if that is a key factor, as well as hinting at the end of the monarchy.

Knock these 3 areas into the long grass and produce evidence that cannot be refuted. Then the swing needed of 10% will happen.
 
 
# Ben Power 2013-01-29 09:50
Has anyone stopped to consider one of the reasons for a high support of SNP but lower support of Independence could be about Scots wanting a balance of power.

Scotland's unicameral house could produce a desire for more security with another balance of power body.

Perhaps we should be seriously discussing elected houses of legislature and review in an independent Scotland. Inconvenient that system may be, but possibly better in the long run.

Bicameral government could probably be more popular for those nervous about Independence.
 
 
# an Olaindeach 2013-01-29 17:46
Having two chambers would be wise goverment anyway. One for the daily politics and a smaller one, more like a 'chambre de reflexion'.
Both of course democratically elected.

Might do justice to the regions within Scotland as well.
 
 
# Alba4ever 2013-01-29 10:20
O/T, I thought last night's Newsnight debate focusing on the opinions of 'New Scots' was excellent - despite the constant interruptions by Ruth Davidson.

Unfortunately host Glen Campbell couldn't (or wouldn't) keep her under control.

But Humza Yousef proved a great spokesman for the Yes campaign.
 
 
# X_Sticks 2013-01-29 11:08
Yes Alba4ever, as I said on another thread, I don't think that debate went to plan for wee Glen. It all went a wee bit glencampbelly right from the start when he tried to pose that Scotland had racial problems and was told by a number of the audience that Scotland was welcoming and inclusive for most immigrants.

That's not to say we don't have any problems, but certainly not on the scale that the no camp would have us believe. They have tried playing the same "be afraid" card with regards to sectarianism.

It was good to see that that most of the audience see westminster as more of a threat than Scottish independence.

Hamza Jusef did a superb job of not letting Davidson or Campbell away with any of their scaremongering nonsense. More of that from the SNP please!
 
 
# fend 2013-01-29 11:38
Just watched it - superb performance, and very welcoming to see an open minded audience.
Worth a watch if you need cheered up.
bbc.co.uk/.../...
 
 
# Dundonian West 2013-01-29 12:35
Thanks for the link. Last evening I was channel hopping and caught a glimpse of Ruth Davidson waving her bit of paper and interrupting in a hectoring manner----I continued channel hopping!
 
 
# farrochie 2013-01-29 14:48
Very good debate. Ruth foolishly brought up the "border control" red herring. Does she not realise the border is completely open between the Republic of Ireland and N Ireland?
 
 
# proudscot 2013-01-29 14:56
Thanks for the link, fend. As a result, I watched the programme, which I had missed when it was broadcast live. It was much better than some similar programmes I have watched in the past, when the unionists on the "panels" have usually outnumbered the pro-independence members by three to one. The audience were also balanced and moderate in their views too.

My only negative impression was, and still is, what an aggressive, shouty wee woman Ruth Davidson is. She does neither herself, the Tory Party, nor the No Campaign any favours. Long may that continue, say I!
 
 
# Tappietourrie 2013-01-29 18:06
I was volunteer handing out leaflets with information on the ‘Yes’ campaign. It provided good marketing information for me and knowledge of who exactly we have to target for the Yes result. I found the ‘yes’ and ‘no’ opinions about equal but when questioned in more depth regarding specific information as to why they were of that opinion the results were lacking in knowledge of pros and cons. The vast majority were unsure as to how they would vote. This group consisted predominately of women who had to be convinced that it was a good thing.
The results left me with the opinion that truthful and relevant information is definitely required by the unsure group in society to convince them independence is the way forward. There is also an element within the ‘no’ camp that could be turned by giving them sufficient information of the positive side of independence.
No use sitting on your backside complaining get out there.
 
 
# kenneth_clark336 2013-01-29 18:15
There did appear to be a cosiness between Campbell and Davidson, exchanging glances at times as if to say, "Shall I take this one or will you?" A poster on another thread says the paper Davidson was waving around was printed on BBC paper. Any confirmation on that? I was very aware that when some examples of how ethnic groups have difficulty being appointed to certain positions in Scotland, neither the BBC or the Conservatives were included. Given the line up of the programme they both have a case to answer in this respect. Davidson's disrespectful behaviour diminishes Scottish politics. Time for her to grow up. I note Annabel Goldie has returned to her normal seat for FMQ's. After Davidson's Nixon jibe, which obviously horrified her, she had sat next to the Greens, looking very forlorn. Who can blame her?
 
 
# bruman 2013-01-30 09:39
Has anyone got a link to the debate that works? When I click the link above I just get "this episode is unavailable". Thanks.
 
 
# snowthistle 2013-01-30 11:53
?? worked fine for me bruman
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments